I. DANIEL LEVY, APPELLANT,

v.

LANCELOT ASSOCIATES, D/B/A LANCELOT HALL, AND THE INSURANCE COMPANY OF NORTH AMERICA, APPELLEES

Citator

Cited By

• Stricklin v. Stricklin, 383 So. 2d 1183 (Fla. 5th DCA 1980)
  …that she was having marital difficulties and that she had changed her place of residence several times, was not sufficient to justify a change in custody absent a finding that the child was adversely affected by the conditions. Spradley v. Spradley, 312 So. 2d 215 (Fla. 1st DCA 1975). Likewise, the remarriage of the non-custodial parent and the acquisition' by that parent of a suitable home are not changes of circumstances which of themselves justify a transfer. Ritsi v. Ritsi, 160 So. 2d 159 (Fla. 3d DCA 196…
• McINTYRE v. Nance Ruth McINTYRE, 452 So. 2d 14 (Fla. 1st DCA 1984)
  …he was having marital difficulties and that she [*25] had changed her place of residence several times, was not sufficient to justify a change in custody absent a finding that the child was adversely affected by the conditions. Spradley v. Spradley, 312 So. 2d 215 (Fla. 1st DCA 1975). Likewise, the remarriage of the non-custodial parent and the acquisition by that parent of a suitable home are not changes of circumstances which of themselves justify a transfer. Ritsi v. Ritsi, 160 So. 2d 159 (Fla. 3d DCA 1964…
• Anderson v. Anderson, 736 So. 2d 49 (Fla. 5th DCA 1999)
  …s, and conducting a hearing. The trial court’s order recognized the conflict in the testimony and noted erroneous findings of the hearing master. Further, citing Stricklin v. Stricklin, 383 So. 2d 1183 (Fla. 5th DCA 1980), and Spradley v. Spradley, 312 So. 2d 215 (Fla. 1st DCA 1975), the court wrote that the father had the burden of showing that there was a substantial change of circumstances and that it was in the best interest [*55] of the child to change custody, and that a change in circumstances alone w…

Authorities Cited

• Middleton v. Lomaskin, 266 So. 2d 678 (Fla. 3d DCA 1972)
• Partelow v. Edgar, 219 So. 2d 72 (Fla. 4th DCA 1969)