J. D. BECKETT, APPELLANT,
v.
E. H. BECKETT, AND BANK OF CLEARWATER, APPELLEES
J. D. BECKETT, APPELLANT,
E. H. BECKETT, AND BANK OF CLEARWATER, APPELLEES
102 Fla. 524
Florida Supreme Court (1931)
Positive Treatment
Also reported at: 135 So. 883
Cited by 6 cases
Opinion of the Court
— -This cause having heretofore been submitted to the Court upon the transcript of the record of the decrees herein and briefs and argument of counsel for the respective parties and the record having been seen and inspected, and the Court being now advised of its judgment to be given in the premises, it seems to the Court that there is no error in the said decrees. It is therefore considered, ordered and decreed by the Court that the said decrees of the circuit court be, and the same are hereby affirmed except that part of the decree of February 21, 1929, reading as follows: “A judgment for said amount be and is hereby entered for said amount against complainant herein”.
Affirmed.
Whitpield, P.J., and Terrell and Davis, J.J., concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Gray v. Callahan, 143 Fla. 673 (Fla. 1940)…ee of the owner against a tenant claiming his rights to hold under a prior lease and in this case the suit is by the grantee from the former owner against a prior lessee of the former owner. “The case of Ex Parte Bienville Investment Company, Inc., 102 Fla. 524, 136 Sou. Rep. 328, is in line with the West Drug Stores, Inc., case, supra, and deals with questions involved here. In that case it was said: “ ‘It is contended that because the petition of the landlord alleges that the premises are occupied by th…
-
State v. Hon. David Elmer Ward, 135 Fla. 885 (Fla. 1939)…ee of the- owner against a tenant claiming his rights to hold under a prior lease and in this case the suit is by the grantee from the former owner against a prior lessee of the former owner. The case of Ex parte Bienville Investment Company, Inc., 102 Fla. 524, 136 Southern 328, is in line with the West Drug Stores, Inc., case, supra, and deals with questions involved here. In that case it was said: “It is contended that because the petition of the landlord alleges that the premises are occupied by the d…
-
Brownlee v. Sussman, 238 So. 2d 317 (Fla. 3d DCA 1970)…on for possession of non-payment of rent. The trial court correctly held that the purpose of the legislative acts is to secure to the landlord the right of immediate possession upon the failure of the tenant to pay rent. Ex parte Bienville Inv. Co., 102 Fla. 524, 136 So. 328 (1931); State ex rel. Rich v. Ward, 135 Fla. 885, 185 So. 846 (1939). [*319] Although equitable defenses may not be raised in an action instituted pursuant to § 83.05, Fla.Stat., F.S.A., it should be noted that a court of equity will re…