WALTER RICHARD AMELL, APPELLANT,
v.
THE STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
WALTER RICHARD AMELL, APPELLANT,
THE STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
319 So. 2d 621
Florida District Court of Appeal, Third District (1975)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 4 cases
Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.
Appellant was found guilty by a jury of two counts of robbery and sentenced by the trial court to two consecutive life terms which were later modified to two concurrent life terms.
Appellant has appealed the judgment and sentences. The several grounds relied on by the appellant for reversal have been considered by us in the light of the record, briefs and arguments of counsel and we find no reversible error has been shown. The record discloses that the case was fully and fairly tried, that the verdict is supported by the evidence and that the several rulings of the trial court challenged by the appellant did not on the record and under the law constitute harmful error. Therefore the judgment and sentences appealed are affirmed.
Affirmed.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Amell v. State, 344 So. 2d 944 (Fla. 3d DCA 1977)…PER CURIAM. Appellant is appealing from the trial court’s order denying him relief pursuant to Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.850. Appellant was convicted of two counts of robbery. His conviction was appealed and affirmed. Amell v. State, 319 So. 2d 621 (Fla. 3d DCA 1975). A motion for relief pursuant to Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.850 was filed in the trial court and denied. Appellant contends in this appeal that the trial court erred in denying the motion for such relief. We find the contention to be withou…
-
Rodriguez v. State, 502 So. 2d 18 (Fla. 3d DCA 1986)….Ct. 2211, 72 L.Ed.2d 652 (1982); State v. Smith, 249 So. 2d 16 (Fla.1971); Stephenson v. State, 407 So. 2d 926 (Fla. 3d DCA 1981); Harvey v. State, 334 So. 2d 170 (Fla. 3d DCA 1976); Amos v. State, 327 So. 2d 782 (Fla. 3d DCA 1976); Amell v. State, 319 So. 2d 621 (Fla. 3d DCA 1975). Second, the defendant presents a potpourri point in which he complains that “[t]he trial herein was a mockery of justice where the prosecutor comments and was permitted over repeated objection to make a feature of other crimes e…