WALTER RICHARD AMELL, APPELLANT,
v.
THE STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
Explore caselaw by topic → Browse Postconviction Relief cases and more on FLexlaw
PER CURIAM.
Appellant is appealing from the trial court’s order denying him relief pursuant to Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.850.
Appellant was convicted of two counts of robbery. His conviction was appealed and affirmed. Amell v. State, 319 So. 2d 621 (Fla. 3d DCA 1975). A motion for relief pursuant to Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.850 was filed in the trial court and denied.
Appellant contends in this appeal that the trial court erred in denying the motion for such relief. We find the contention to be without merit.
We have carefully examined the record on appeal and considered the briefs, and have concluded that appellant has not presented any grounds which would entitle him to the relief sought. Suarez v. State, 220 So. 2d 442 (Fla. 3d DCA 1969); Peterson v. State, 237 So. 2d 223 (Fla. 1st DCA 1970); Clements v. State, 320 So. 2d 44 (Fla. 3d DCA 1975).
Therefore, the order appealed is affirmed.
Affirmed.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By (11 total)
-
Noah v. Noah, 491 So. 2d 1124 (Fla. 1986)…parties by the dissolution. Id. at 1019. While factually Williamson did not involve the issue of what role, if any, a spouse’s adultery should play in dissolution proceedings, our jurisdiction was predicated on conflict with Claughton v. Claughton, 344 So. 2d 944 (Fla. 3d DCA 1977), and Escobar v. Escobar, 300 So. 2d 702 (Fla. 3d DCA 1974), both of which explicitly dealt with that issue. Our discussion in Williamson of Escobar centered on the proper interpretation of section 61.08(1), Florida Statutes (1973)…
-
Williamson v. Veva C. Williamson, 367 So. 2d 1016 (Fla. 1979)…or writ of certiorari to review a decision of the District Court of Appeal, First District, reported at 353 So. 2d 880, which is alleged to be in conflict with the decisions of the District Court of Appeal, Third District, in Claughton v. Claughton, 344 So. 2d 944 (Fla. 3d DCA 1977), and Escobar v. Escobar, 300 So. 2d 702 (Fla. 3d DCA 1974). We have jurisdiction pursuant to article V, section 3(b)(3), Florida Constitution. Petitioner, Ollie R. Williamson, filed for dissolution of his marriage to respondent,…
-
French v. French, 452 So. 2d 647 (Fla. 4th DCA 1984)…bar due to intentional conduct or gross negligence on the part of the father, our evaluation of the visitation ban would be different. But, as indicated, the court relied on other factors which do not support a total ban. See Claughton v. Claughton, 344 So. 2d 944 (Fla. 3d DCA 1977). Accordingly, the ban must be lifted. However, in light of the concern and sensitivity which the trial court brought to this ease, we are confident that the court will exercise its discretion to fashion appropriate limitations for…
Previewing 3 of 11 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligenceAuthorities Cited
- Peterson v. State, 237 So. 2d 223 (Fla. 1st DCA 1970)
- Clements v. State, 320 So. 2d 44 (Fla. 3d DCA 1975)
- Efrain T. Suarez v. State, 220 So. 2d 442 (Fla. 3d DCA 1969)
- Amell v. State, 319 So. 2d 621 (Fla. 3d DCA 1975)