FRANK A. LEE ET AL., APPELLANTS,
v.
ORVAL L. SHOBE, APPELLEE
FRANK A. LEE ET AL., APPELLANTS,
ORVAL L. SHOBE, APPELLEE
66 So. 2d 256
Florida Supreme Court (1953)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 2 cases
Opinion of the Court
MATHEWS, Justice.
The only difference between this case and that of Lee v. Delmar, Fla., 66 So. 2d 252, is that the appellee in this case is the Tax Assessor for the City of Lake Wales in Polk County, Florida, and devotes about 50% of his working time to his occupation as real estate salesman and about 50% to his occupation as Tax Assessor. Affirmed upon the authority of Lee v. Delmar, Fla., 66 So. 2d 252.
ROBERTS, C. J., and TERRELL and SEBRING, JJ., concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Shead v. State, 367 So. 2d 264 (Fla. 3d DCA 1979)…s rendered on the same day are, therefore, treated as one offense for purposes of such a provision in a habitual criminal statute. Lovett v. Cochran, 137 So. 2d 572 (Fla. 1962); Perry v. Mayo, 72 So. 2d 382 (Fla. 1954); Mayo v. State ex rel. Murray, 66 So. 2d 256 (Fla.1953); Reed v. Mayo, 61 So. 2d 757 (Fla.1952); Scott v. Mayo, 159 Fla. 816, 32 So. 2d 821 (1947); Joyner v. State, 158 Fla. 806, 30 So. 2d 304 (1947); 4 Wharton’s Criminal Procedure, 288-289 (12th ed. Torcia 1976); Anno., 24 A.L.R.2d 1247, 1249…
-
Hayes v. State, 587 So. 2d 578 (Fla. 3d DCA 1991)…ny] offense subsequent to his conviction on the first [felony] offense.” Shead v. State, 367 So. 2d 264, 266 (Fla. 3d DCA 1979); see Lovett v. Cochran, 137 So. 2d 572 (Fla.1962); Perry v. Mayo, 72 So. 2d 382 (Fla.1954); Mayo v. State ex rel. Murray, 66 So. 2d 256 (Fla.1953); Reed v. Mayo, 61 So. 2d 757 (Fla.1952); Scott v. Mayo, 159 Fla. 816, 32 So. 2d 821 (1947); Joyner v. State, 158 Fla. 806, 30 So. 2d 304 (1947). The recent decision of Barnes v. State, 576 So. 2d 758 (Fla. 1st DCA 1991) (en banc), reitera…
Authorities Cited
- State ex rel. Young v. Kelly, 66 So. 2d 252 (Fla. 1953)