GEORGE ALLEN JOHNSON, APPELLANT,
v.
THE STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE

Fla. 3d DCA | 1976-02-10
No. 75-16
Before PEARSON, HENDRY and HAVERFIELD, JJ.
328 So. 2d 33 Florida District Court of Appeal, Third District (1976) Positive Treatment
Cited by 1 case


Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.

PER CURIAM.

The defendant appeals an order denying his motion for relief pursuant to CrPR 3.-850. The single point presented on appeal urges that the trial court erred because the record did not conclusively refute defendant’s allegation of ineffectiveness of counsel at sentencing. This point was not included in petitioner’s written motion for relief but it appears that it was the only point which was presented or argued to the trial judge. The motion was denied.

It is our view that the record, which shows that the defendant 1) pleaded guilty to eleven felonies including charges of grand larceny, larceny of an automobile, burglary and several counts of robbery and 2) received a sentence of only ten years in the state prison, conclusively refutes the charge that defendant was not adequately represented at the time of sentencing. See Caplinger v. State, Fla.App.1973, 271 So. 2d 780.

Affirmed.


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Cited By

  • In re Est. of Mayer Weinstein v. Nash, 339 So. 2d 700 (Fla. 3d DCA 1976)
    …ll. There being substantial evidence to support this determination, we find no abuse of discretion. See Watts v. Newport, 151 Fla. 209, 9 So. 2d 417 (1942); In re Estate of Whitehead, 287 So. 2d 9 (Fla.1973). Affirmed. . In re Estate of Weinstein, 328 So. 2d 33 (Fla.3d DCA 1976).…

Authorities Cited

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw