E. PAUL WININGER, APPELLANT,
v.
RUDOLPH LEOPOLD ET AL., APPELLEES
Explore caselaw by topic → Browse Delivery Of Deed cases and more on FLexlaw
PER CURIAM.
This is an appeal of a summary final judgment entered in favor of appellees, Rudolph Leopold, Johanna Leopold, Theodore Andrews and Mary L. Andrews, and against appellant, E. Paul Wininger, in an action to determine title to a certain parcel of property.
The pleadings and affidavits reveal that there is a genuine issue of material fact precluding summary judgment; specifically, whether the deletion of appellant’s name from a warranty deed dated June 3, 1969 conveying the property occurred prior to or after the delivery of said deed. Since fact issues exist, summary judgment was prematurely entered and we, therefore, reverse and remand for further proceedings consistent with the views herein expressed. Rule 1.510(c) Fla.RCP (1975); Leaks v. Adeimy, 195 So. 2d 47 (Fla.App. 1967).
Reversed and remanded for further proceedings.
CROSS and DOWNEY, JJ., and SCHULZ, GEORGE E., Associate Judge, concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Preston v. State, 373 So. 2d 451 (Fla. 2d DCA 1979)…ful intent when the items in question were considered by the court to be common household tools, or tools of ordinary or everyday use. For example, the surrounding circumstances were held not sufficient to show an unlawful intent in Biggs v. State, 329 So. 2d 415 (Fla. 4th DCA 1976) (gloves, screwdrivers, knife, pliers, tin cutters, and large bolt cutters carried in an automobile); People v. Taylor, supra, (pliers, screwdriver, and pencil flashlight); People v. Spencer, 10 Ill.App.3d 229, 294 N.E. 2d 17 (197…
Authorities Cited
- Miami Gray Line Boats, Inc. v. Dade Cnty., 195 So. 2d 47 (Fla. 3d DCA 1967)