ERNEST MOSS
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA
ERNEST MOSS
STATE OF FLORIDA
155 Fla. 20
Florida Supreme Court (1944)
Positive Treatment
Also reported at: 19 So. 2d 408
Cited by 6 cases
Opinion of the Court
Appellant, having been convicted of manslaughter under the provisions of Sec. 860.01 Fla. Stats, 1941 (same F.S.A.), *21has brought the record and judgment here for review on appeal.
The only question presented amounts to a challenge to the sufficiency of the evidence to support the verdict and judgment.
There is disclosed by the transcript of the record ample evidence, (which if believed by the jury,) to support the conviction.
No reversible error having been made to appear, the judgment is affirmed.
So ordered.
BUFORD, C. J., BROWN, THOMAS and SEBRING, JJ., concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Price v. Jordan, 115 So. 2d 444 (Fla. 2d DCA 1959)…183 So. 738; and Elks Club v. Adair, 1928, 95 Fla. 415, 116 So. 26. The question is whether the trial judge abused his discretion, in the light of the record, in declaring the verdict excessive. See the case of Turner v. Krieder, 1944, 154 Fla. 832, 19 So. 2d 408; and De La Vallina v. De La Vallina, supra. Generally, see also 23 Fla.Jur., New Trial, sections 90, 91, and 92, pp. 459-462. Another case applicable in principle and very similar to the present case is Kovacs v. Venetian Sedan Service, Inc., Fla.A…
-
Nolan Clark v. Russo, 133 So. 2d 764 (Fla. 2d DCA 1961)….” It is also stated in Price v, Jordan, supra: “ * * * The question is whether the trial judge abused his discretion, in the light of the record, in declaring the verdict excessive. See the case of Turner v. Krieder [Kreider], 1944, 154 Fla. 832, 19 So. 2d 408; and De La Vallina v. De La Vallina, supra, [90 Fla. 905, 107 So. 339], Generally, see also 23 Fla.Jur., New Trial, sections 90, 91, and 92, pp. 459-462. “Another case applicable in principle and very similar to the present case is Kovacs v. Veneti…
-
Ekhoff v. Hoffman, 200 So. 2d 641 (Fla. 2d DCA 1967)…,000 and granting a new trial unless plaintiff entered a remittitur of $8,000. The question is whether the trial judge abused his discretion, in the light of the record, in declaring the verdict excessive. See Turner v. Kreider, 1944, 154 Fla. 832, 19 So. 2d 408; De La Vallina v. De La Vallina, 1926, 90 Fla. 905, 107 So. 339; and Fla.Jur., New Trials, §§ 90-92. The rule, often quoted, was stated in De La Vallina v. De La Vallina, 1926, 90 Fla. 905, 107 So. at 339, as follows: “In requiring the entry of a…
Previewing 3 of 5 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence