HORACE OLIVER RUCKER, APPELLANT,
v.
THE STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE

Fla. 3d DCA | 1976-07-16
No. 73-1252
Before HENDRY, HAVERFIELD and NATHAN, JJ.
335 So. 2d 361 Florida District Court of Appeal, Third District (1976) Positive Treatment
Cited by 4 cases


Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.

PER CURIAM.

This cause recurs for consideration upon the mandate of the Supreme Court of Florida pursuant to the opinion and judgment of that court filed April 7,1976 (330 So. 2d 470) vacating the judgment of this court in this cause entered on November 26, 1974, 307 So. 2d 830.

In accord with the directive of the judgment of the Supreme Court of Florida this court’s mandate heretofore issued in this cause on February 21, 1975 is withdrawn, this court’s judgment filed November 26, 1974 is vacated and the said opinion and judgment of the Supreme Court of Florida is herewith made the opinion and judgment of this court as to appellant’s Point I.

After a careful consideration of the appellant’s remaining two points on appeal, we find no reversible error has been made to appear. Accordingly, the judgment of conviction and sentence is affirmed.


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Cited By

  • Earlene P. Bullard v. Bullard, 380 So. 2d 1090 (Fla. 3d DCA 1980)
    …ard’s amended complaint properly prayed for partition under Sec. 64.041, Fla.Stat. (1977), and Mrs. Bullard did not contest that application. The final judgment should therefore itself order the partition of the marital domicile. Pantuso v. Pantuso, 335 So. 2d 361 (Fla.2d DCA 1976); see Carlsen v. Carlsen, 346 So. 2d 132 (Fla.2d DCA 1977); Rankin v. Rankin, 258 So. 2d 489 (Fla.2d DCA 1972). The order under review is affirmed in part and reversed in part and the cause remanded for entry of an appropriate revi…
  • Savage v. Savage, 556 So. 2d 1213 (Fla. 2d DCA 1990)
    …egal description of the property. We hold that the husband’s plea for partition substantially complied with section 64.041, Florida Statutes (1987), and due process was achieved. Therefore, partition should have been granted. See Pantuso v. Pantuso, 335 So. 2d 361 (Fla. 2d DCA 1976); Rankin v. Rankin, 258 So. 2d 489 (Fla. 2d DCA 1972). We remand this case to the trial court for entry of an amended final judgment ordering partition of the marital home. Because one child of the parties is still a minor and res…

Authorities Cited

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw