GALE J. STERN, PETITIONER,

v.

INDUSTRIAL RELATIONS COMMISSION, DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE, STATE OF FLORIDA, RESPONDENT

Citator

Cited By

• First Republic Corp. OF Am. v. Hayes, 431 So. 2d 624 (Fla. 3d DCA 1983)
  …to control the trial of cases before [*627] him. This court may not overturn the trial court’s decision absent an abuse of that discretion. Clarke v. Sanders, 363 So. 2d 843 (Fla. 4th DCA 1978); County of Brevard, supra. See also Goldring v. Escapa, 338 So. 2d 871 (Fla. 3d DCA 1976), cert. denied, 346 So. 2d 1248 (Fla.1977); Warriner v. Ferraro, supra. The burden is on the aggrieved party to show that he was prejudiced by the court’s abuse of discretion. Clarke v. Sanders, supra; County of Brevard, supra. De…
• Rhea Schwartz and Herman Schwartz v. M. J. M. Corp., 368 So. 2d 91 (Fla. 3d DCA 1979)
  …c., of the stairway was a proper subject upon which the expert could testify in this case, and that it was error for the trial court to exclude his testimony. See, e. g., Cromarty v. Ford Motor Company, 341 So. 2d 507 (Fla.1976); Goldring v. Escapa, 338 So. 2d 871 (Fla. 3d DCA 1976); Fletcher v. Petman Enterprises, Inc., 324 So. 2d 135 (Fla. 3d DCA 1975); Majeske v. Palm Beach Kennel Club, 117 So. 2d 531 (Fla. 2d DCA 1959), and Millar v. Tropical Gables Corp., 99 So. 2d 589 (Fla. 3d DCA 1958). Accordingly, th…
• Baez v. State, 699 So. 2d 305 (Fla. 3d DCA 1997)
  …no showing that he was not competent to deliberate with the consequence that he need not have been excused at all. See Gamble v. State, 44 Fla. 429, 33 So. 471 (1902); Langston v. State, 212 So. 2d 51 (Fla. 1st DCA 1968). Compare Goldring v. Escapa, 338 So. 2d 871 (Fla. 3d DCA 1976), cert. denied, 346 So .2d 1248 (Fla.1977) (obviously intoxicated juror acting irrationally in open court). Reversed.…