RAUL RODRIGUEZ, APPELLANT,
v.
THE STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
RAUL RODRIGUEZ, APPELLANT,
THE STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
820 So. 2d 1051
Florida District Court of Appeal, Third District (2002)
Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.
As we conclude that the evidence adduced at the probation revocation hearing was sufficient to support the trial court’s revocation of the appellant’s probation according to its oral pronouncements, we affirm the same. We do, however, remand for the trial court to enter a written order consistent with its oral pronouncements. See Cifuentes v. State, 717 So. 2d 136 (Fla. 3d DCA 1998); Taramona v. State, 707 So. 2d 1194 (Fla. 3d DCA 1998).
Affirmed as modified.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Authorities Cited
- Taramona v. State, 707 So. 2d 1194 (Fla. 3d DCA 1998)
- Narciso Alberto v. Dep't OF Child. & Families, 707 So. 2d 1194 (Fla. 3d DCA 1998)
- Faircloth v. State, 717 So. 2d 136 (Fla. 4th DCA 1998)
- Renaldo Antonio Lettsome v. State, 717 So. 2d 136 (Fla. 3d DCA 1998)