BIRMINGHAM FIRE INSURANCE COMPANY OF PENNSYLVANIA, A CORPORATION, SUBROGEE OF GOLDEN GLADES BUILDING CORPORATION, A FLORIDA CORPORATION, APPELLANT,
v.
ALLSTATE INSURANCE COMPANY, A FOREIGN CORPORATION, APPELLEE
AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.
Birmingham Fire Insurance Company, as subrogee of Golden Glades Building Corporation, appeals a summary judgment dismissing its negligence action against Allstate Insurance Company. The court held that Allstate's liability policy covering Moss Plumbing was validly cancelled as to the insured, and therefore Birmingham, as a third-party beneficiary, had no coverage rights when the fire loss occurred.
The policy was effectively cancelled as to Moss Plumbing on January 10, 1973, notwithstanding the failure to provide notice to Dade County. As a third-party beneficiary, Birmingham's rights were no greater than those of the insured, Moss Plumbing, and therefore Birmingham had no coverage under the Allstate policy on the date of loss.
[1] A liability insurance policy provision requiring thirty days' notice of cancellation to a named principal does not extend coverage to a third party who is not the named p…
[2] A subrogee's rights are no greater than the rights of the insured.
Previewing 2 of 4 headnotes on this case. FLexlaw’s editorially structured points of law — every proposition, pinpointed — are reserved for members.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence“From a reading of this provision, it is clear that the policy is in effect as to [*648] the interest of Dade County as the named principal.”
Establishes that the cancellation provision created a duty to notify Dade County as the named principal.
Previewing 1 of 3 key quotes on this case — the court’s exact language, pinpointed for members.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligenceGolden Glades Building Corporation hired Moss Plumbing as a subcontractor. Allstate issued a liability policy to Moss Plumbing effective May 15, 1972,…
The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.
Explore caselaw by topic → Browse Notice Of Cancellation cases and more on FLexlaw
PER CURIAM.
Plaintiff subrogee, Birmingham Fire Insurance Company of Pennsylvania, appeals a summary final judgment for defendant, Allstate Insurance Company, in this negligence action.
Golden Glades Building Corporation which was insured by appellant Birmingham had engaged Moss Plumbing Company as a plumbing subcontractor for several buildings it was constructing in Dade County. Effective May 15, 1972 appellee Allstate had issued a liability insurance policy covering Moss Plumbing. As required by ordinance, the policy provided a certificate of insurance to Metropolitan Dade County which contained the following pertinent provision:
“It is agreed that cancellation of this policy shall not be effective as to the interest of the principal1 hereinafter named until thirty days notice of cancellation has been sent by certified mail to: Metropolitan Dade County, Florida.”
On December 8, 1972 Allstate mailed a notice of cancellation effective January 10, 1973 to Moss Plumbing for non-payment of the premium; but notice of the cancellation was not sent to Dade County. On April 16, 1973 Harrison Mealing, an employee of Moss Plumbing, was installing a hot water heater in one of the buildings under construction when a fire erupted allegedly as a result of his negligent operation of a soldering torch. As a result Golden Glades suffered a $10,192.94 property loss. Birmingham paid Golden Glades for the loss and then Birmingham, as subrogee, filed the instant action against Moss Plumbing, Mealing and Allstate. Allstate answered and moved for summary judgment on the ground its policy with Moss Plumbing was cancelled as of January 10, 1973. After a hearing, summary judgment was entered.
Birmingham appeals and contends the policy was still in effect because Dade County was not given the 30-day cancellation notice as required by the provision set out above.
From a reading of this provision, it is clear that the policy is in effect as to the interest of Dade County as the named principal. Appellant, in essence, is arguing that it is covered under the Allstate policy as a third-party beneficiary. As such, its rights are no greater than that of the insured, Moss Plumbing. See Shingleton v. Bussey, 223 So. 2d 713, 715 (Fla.1969). The policy was effectively cancelled as to Moss Plumbing and, therefore, appellant Birmingham was not covered under Allstate’s policy on April 16, 1973.
Summary judgment affirmed.
. Dade County.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Authorities Cited
- Shingleton v. Bussey, 223 So. 2d 713 (Fla. 1969)
- Gulf Stream Motors, Inc. v. Christina Cook & the Fla. Indus. Comm'n, 223 So. 2d 713 (Fla. 1969)