PEDRO NADAL, APPELLANT,
v.
THE STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE

Fla. 3d DCA | 1977-11-01
No. 76-1228
Before PEARSON, HAVERFIELD and NATHAN, JJ.
351 So. 2d 83 Florida District Court of Appeal, Third District (1977)

Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. See Floyd v. State, 90 So. 2d 105 (Fla.1956); Pearson v. State, 213 So. 2d 616 (Fla.3d DCA 1968); Williams v. State, 280 So. 2d 516 (Fla.3d DCA 1973); Wallace v. State, 319 So. 2d 117 (Fla.3d DCA 1975) and Cappetta v. Wainwright, 203 So. 2d 609 (Fla.1967); State v. Barber, 301 So. 2d 7 (Fla.1974); Crespo v. State, 339 So. 2d 697 (Fla.3d DCA 1976) and Sowell v. State, 342 So. 2d 969 (Fla.1977).


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Authorities Cited

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw