GORDONS JEWELRY COMPANY OF FLORIDA, INC., PETITIONER,
v.
HYMAN FELDMAN AND ESTHER FELDMAN, RESPONDENTS

Fla. 4th DCA | 1977-11-15
No. 76-2662
ALDERMAN, C. J., and LETTS and MOORE, JJ., concur.
351 So. 2d 1117 Florida District Court of Appeal, Fourth District (1977) Negative Treatment
Cited by 10 cases


Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.

PER CURIAM.

By petition for writ of certiorari in an action formerly cognizable at law, petitioner seeks review of an order denying its motion to dismiss count one of respondents’ complaint. We deny certiorari without de-, ciding the merit of petitioner’s contention. Petitioner will have a full, adequate and complete remedy available by appeal from the final judgment if it should be aggrieved thereby. Petitioner urges several reasons why it would be expedient to have the interlocutory order reviewed at this time, none of which are legally sufficient to warrant us granting certiorari. Siegel v. Abramowitz, 309 So. 2d 234 (Fla. 4th DCA 1975); Solitron Devices, Inc. v. Reiland, 311 So. 2d 729 (Fla. 4th DCA 1975); Santini Brothers, Inc. v. Grover, 338 So. 2d 79 (Fla. 4th DCA 1976); and Johnson v. General Motors Corporation, 350 So. 1119 (Fla. 4th DCA 1977).

CERTIORARI DENIED.

ALDERMAN, C. J., and LETTS and MOORE, JJ., concur.


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Cited By

  • Martin-Johnson, Inc. v. Savage, 509 So. 2d 1097 (Fla. 1987)
    …peal. Brooks v. Owens, 97 So. 2d 693 (Fla.1957); Kilgore v. Bird, 149 Fla. 570, 6 So. 2d 541 (1942). Ordinarily, orders on motions to strike or dismiss claims do not qualify for review by certiorari. Gordons Jewelry Co. of Florida, Inc. v. Feldman, 351 So. 2d 1117 (Fla. 4th DCA 1977); Allstate Ins. Co. v. Shupack, 335 So. 2d 620 (Fla. 3d DCA 1976); Hotel Roosevelt Co. v. Hill, 196 So. 2d 233 (Fla. 1st DCA 1967); But see Radio Communications Corp. v. Oki Electronics of America, Inc., 277 So. 2d 289 (Fla. 4th D…
  • B.J. Pearce v. Doral Mobile Home Villas, Inc., 521 So. 2d 282 (Fla. 2d DCA 1988)
    …rari review of an order denying a motion to dismiss or strike a claim for punitive damages. Generally, orders on motions to dismiss or strike claims do not qualify for review by certiorari. See, e.g., Gordons Jewelry Co. of Florida, Inc. v. Feldman, 351 So. 2d 1117 (Fla. 4th DCA 1977). However, because a claim for punitive damages is usually accompanied by demands for discovery relating to the defendant’s finances, the use of certiorari has been somewhat liberalized in cases where the claim for punitive damage…
  • …ke the remedy inadequate. See Deseret Ranches of Florida, Inc. v. St. Johns River Water Management Dist., 406 So. 2d 1132 (Fla. 5th DCA 1981), aff'd in part, rev’d in part, 421 So. 2d 1067 (Fla.1982); Gordons Jewelry Co. of Florida, Inc. v. Feldman, 351 So. 2d 1117 (Fla. 4th DCA 1977). A party burdened by an erroneous ruling in an administrative proceeding is no worse off than any civil litigant who has to await the final judgment before deciding whether to appeal an adverse interlocutoi-y ruling. The pax-ties…

Previewing 3 of 5 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.

Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence

Authorities Cited

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw