ROBERT L. RANDALL, JR., APPELLANT,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
ROBERT L. RANDALL, JR., APPELLANT,
STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
352 So. 2d 566
Florida District Court of Appeal, Second District (1977)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 2 cases
Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.
After reviewing the briefs and record on appeal, we find appellant has failed to demonstrate any reversible error; therefore, the judgment appealed is affirmed. The judgment and sentence of the court, while indicating the appellant was to receive credit for all time served in jail, does not specifically set forth the period of credit time to be allowed as required by Section 921.161(1) Florida Statutes. Smith v. State, 310 So. 2d 770 (Fla.2d DCA 1975).
Remanded for correction of the sentence; otherwise affirmed. Appellant need not be present for this purpose.
HOBSON, Acting C. J., and RYDER and DANAHY, JJ., concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Boshears v. State, 371 So. 2d 725 (Fla. 1st DCA 1979)…lity. Contrast Jenkins v. State, 349 So. 2d 1191 (Fla. 4th DCA 1977); Lombardi v. State, 358 So. 2d 220 (Fla. 1st DCA 1978). There was error, however, in the court’s failure to specify appellant’s jail-time credit in the sentence. Randall v. State, 352 So. 2d 566 (Fla. 2d DCA 1977). Accordingly, we remand for that correction but appellant need not be present at that time. ROBERT P. SMITH, Jr., Acting C. J., and ERVIN and LARRY G. SMITH, JJ., concur.…
Authorities Cited
- Smith v. State, 310 So. 2d 770 (Fla. 2d DCA 1975)
- Odom v. State, 310 So. 2d 770 (Fla. 2d DCA 1975)