BUCKLEY TOWERS CONDOMINIUM, INC., ETC., ET AL., APPELLANTS,
v.
MINERVA MILLIS, INDIVIDUALLY AND ON BEHALF OF BUCKLEY TOWERS CONDOMINIUM, INC., ETC., ET AL., APPELLEES

Fla. 3d DCA | 1977-12-06
No. 76-2047
Before PEARSON, HUBBART and KE-HOE, JJ.
352 So. 2d 585 Florida District Court of Appeal, Third District (1977) Positive Treatment
Cited by 2 cases


Opinion of the Court
KEHOE, Judge.

KEHOE, Judge.

Appellant brings this appeal from an order of the trial court denying its motion to intervene in the cause as a party defendant. Appellant’s three points on appeal relate to the question of whether the trial court abused its discretion or erred by denying appellant’s motion. We have carefully considered each of these points and have concluded that the trial court did not abuse its discretion or err in denying the motion. Therefore, we affirm the order of the trial court dated October 7, 1976, denying appellant’s motion to intervene. See Miracle House Corporation v. Haige, 96 So. 2d 417 (Fla.1957); Riviera Club v. Belle Mead Development Corp., 141 Fla. 538, 194 So. 783 (1959); Coral Bay Prop. Own. Ass’n v. City of Coral Gables, 305 So. 2d 853 (Fla. 3d DCA 1974); Oster v. Cay Construction Company, 204 So. 2d 539 (Fla. 4th DCA 1967); and Fla.R.Civ.P. 1.230.

Affirmed.


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Cited By

  • Vogel v. Smith, 371 So. 2d 719 (Fla. 3d DCA 1979)
    …5 (Fla.1955). The trial court has discretion to allow an interested party to intervene below and assert a claim under these circumstances. See Miracle House Corporation v. Haige, 96 So. 2d 417 (Fla.1957); Buckley Towers Condominium, Inc. v. Millis, 352 So. 2d 585 (Fla.3d DCA 1977); cert. denied, 360 So. 2d 1247 (Fla.1978); Coral Bay Property Owners’ Association v. City of Coral Gables, 305 So. 2d 853 (Fla.3d DCA 1974); and Fla.R. Civ.P. 1.230. Reversed.…

Authorities Cited

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw