CARMEL WUAGNEUX, APPELLANT,
v.
GEORGE WUAGNEUX, APPELLEE
Explore caselaw by topic → Browse Modification Of Divorce Judgment cases and more on FLexlaw
PER CURIAM.
Wife seeks to modify and enforce by contempt the terms of a New York divorce judgment which has been established as a Florida judgment. The trial court denied both her petition for modification and her motion for contempt.
Based upon the record in this case, w» find no reversible error. The wife failed to show a substantial change of condition which would justify modification of the original judgment. Also, the wife failed to establish whether or not the unpaid $20,000 was lump sum alimony or a payment due to the wife as part of a property settlement agreement. Being unable to make this determination, the trial court correctly denied wife’s motion for contempt. Burke v. Burke, 336 So. 2d 1237 (Fla. 4th DCA 1976).
Our holding in this case shall not prevent the wife in subsequent proceedings from either seeking modification or enforcement of the judgment as provided by law.
AFFIRMED.
DOWNEY and ALDERMAN, JJ., and PARHAM, HARRY C., Associate Judge, concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Warner v. Caldwell, 354 So. 2d 91 (Fla. 3d DCA 1977)…ecifically made reference to the building loan agreement and therefore, it was not error for the trial judge to allow the Group I guarantors to refer to a breach of said agreement as a defense to their liability on the guaranty. Schaeffer v. Gilmer, 353 So. 2d 847 (Fla. 1st DCA 1977), opinion filed August 4, 1977. Appellants next contend that the trial court erred in its various instructions to the jury. After carefully reviewing the instructions as a whole, however, we cannot say that the jury was misled as…
-
Chotka v. Fidelco Growth Invs., 383 So. 2d 1169 (Fla. 2d DCA 1980)…construction for the benefit of anyone other than itself and may not be held liable for construction defects. Accord, Armetta v. Clevetrust Realty Investors, 359 So. 2d 540 (Fla.4th DCA), cert. denied, 366 So. 2d 879 (Fla.1978); Schaeffer v. Gilmer, 353 So. 2d 847 (Fla.1st DCA 1977). However, appellees became more than just a lender when they took title to the condominium project, completed construction, and, holding themselves out to be the developer and owner of the project, advertised and sold units to pur…
-
Cheek v. McGOWAN Elec. Supply Co., 483 So. 2d 1373 (Fla. 1st DCA 1985)…e principal-debtor and guarantee is purely one of special contract; and that in the absence of a specific provision so requiring, no obligation rests upon the guarantee to advise or notify the guarantor, [citations omitted] See Schaeffer v. Gilmer, 353 So. 2d 847 (Fla. 1st DCA 1977), wherein the guarantors and creditors were parties to a contract of guaranty which specifically incorporated the loan agreement between the debtor (contractor) and the creditor, and this court held that the individual [*1379] gua…
Previewing 3 of 5 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligenceAuthorities Cited
- Burke v. Burke, 336 So. 2d 1237 (Fla. 4th DCA 1976)