ROBERT N. THOMPSON, APPELLANT,
v.
THE STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
ROBERT N. THOMPSON, APPELLANT,
THE STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
353 So. 2d 1240
Florida District Court of Appeal, Third District (1978)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 2 cases
Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.
Affirmed. See: Cunningham v. State, 239 So. 2d 21 (Fla. 1st DCA 1970); Section 59.041, Florida Statutes (1975); Section 924.33, Florida Statutes (1975).
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Tucker v. State, 388 So. 2d 6 (Fla. 3d DCA 1980)…e he was armed with a dangerous weapon, as charged in count one. We thus find no error in the imposition of sentence accordingly. Yarborough v. State, 94 Fla. 143, 114 So. 237 (1927); Hambrick v. State, 80 Fla. 672, 86 So. 623 (1920); Coon v. State, 353 So. 2d 1240 (Fla.3d DCA 1978). Since the appellant’s remaining points, which challenge the sufficiency of the evidence against him are patently without [*7] merit, see Section 810.02(1), Fla.Stat. (1979), the judgment under review, in its entirety, is Affir…
Authorities Cited
- Cunningham v. State, 239 So. 2d 21 (Fla. 1st DCA 1970)