DOROTHY MAE BEASLEY AND RALPH J. BEASLEY, HER HUSBAND, APPELLANTS,
v.
GLADYS D. CLEGHORN, ALLSTATE INSURANCE COMPANY, ADAMS R. HANSON, FLORIDA FARM BUREAU INSURANCE COMPANY AND AETNA CASUALTY SURETY COMPANY, APPELLEES
PER CURIAM.
Affirmed.
ANSTEAD and MOORE, JJ., concur.
DAUKSCH, J., concurs specially.
DAUKSCH, Judge,
concurring specially.
While I agree with the affirmance of this matter, I am compelled to note the appellants in their brief alleged the trial court erred in refusing to allow the husband to claim loss of wages on account of his having to take time from work to attend to his wife while she was in the hospital. Appellants cite some law from other jurisdictions which support a claim for loss of wages by a spouse of an injured person.
Perhaps given the proper vehicle an appellate court might agree with appellants’ claim.
Appellants do not cite any particular page in the transcript where appellant was denied sought for relief and did not allege in the complaint anything to permit any evidence of his lost wages. No allegata, no probata.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Ernie W. Norman v. State, 388 So. 2d 613 (Fla. 3d DCA 1980)…omatic standing, we are free to declare that the automatic standing rule is no more. Thirty-four Florida cases have considered the Jones decision. With the exception of three cases, State v. Dycus, 238 So. 2d 493 (Fla. 2d DCA 1970); Curry v. State, 355 So. 2d 462 (Fla. 2d DCA 1978); and Prickett v. State, 305 So. 2d 222 (Fla. 2d DCA 1974), the reliance on Jones concerned other aspects of that decision, e. g., the “legitimately-on-the-premises” concept of standing.5 In State v. Dycus, supra, the court acknow…
-
Giddens v. State, 404 So. 2d 163 (Fla. 2d DCA 1981)…minal propensity) in issue by demonstrating that he had been previously arrested. This is precisely what Williams v. State, 110 So. 2d 654 (Fla.1959), as codified in section 90.404, Florida Statutes (1979), tries to avoid. See, also, Curry v. State, 355 So. 2d 462 (Fla.2d DCA 1978). We find no merit in the other points which appellant raises. We reverse the judgment and remand the case for a new trial. SCHEB, C. J., and HOBSON, J., concur. . Counsel also argued that the statement was an improper comment on…
-
Daley v. State, 387 So. 2d 971 (Fla. 4th DCA 1980)…Court has never considered squarely the question whether defendants charged with non-possessory crimes . are entitled to be relieved of their dilemma entirely. 390 U.S. at 391, 88 S.Ct. at 975. The Second District Court of Appeal in Curry v. State, 355 So. 2d 462 (Fla. 2d DCA 1978), viewed Jones as estopping the state from asserting “no standing” in the situation under consideration. Judge Grimes, speaking for the court, said: In Jones, the U.S. Supreme Court held that when the prosecution allege[d] possess…
Previewing 3 of 4 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence