F & D ELECTRICAL CONTRACTORS, INC. A FLORIDA CORPORATION, EMELIO DIAZ AND JEWELL DIAZ, APPELLANTS,

v.

MILLER & SOLOMON, INC., A FLORIDA CORPORATION, APPELLEE

Citator

Cited By

• Zediker v. Zediker, 444 So. 2d 1034 (Fla. 1st DCA 1984)
  …mphasis supplied). Accord Culpepper v. Culpepper, 408 So. 2d 782 (Fla. 2d DCA 1982); Stricklin v. Stricklin, 383 So. 2d at 1184; Garvey v. Garvey, 383 So. 2d 1172 (Fla. 2d DCA 1980); Adams v. Adams, 385 So. 2d 688 (Fla. 3d DCA 1980); Baker v. Baker, 360 So. 2d 19 (Fla. 4th DCA 1978); Robinson v. Robinson, 333 So. 2d 526 (Fla. 2d DCA 1976); Nicholson v. Nicholson, 311 So. 2d 676 (Fla. 4th DCA 1975). Our position is additionally supported by the following rule, also unaltered [*1038] by Canakaris, requiring th…
• Nury Agudo v. Marcelo Agudo, 411 So. 2d 249 (Fla. 3d DCA 1982)
  …azier, 109 Fla. 164, 147 So. 464 (1933); Meadows v. Meadows, 78 Fla. 576, 83 So. 392 (1919). While the principle of res adjudicata has been held to apply to the issue of custody, Walfish v. Walfish, 383 So. 2d 274 (Fla. 3d DCA 1980); Baker v. Baker, 360 So. 2d 19 (Fla. 4th DCA 1978); Avery v. Avery, 314 So. 2d 198 (Fla. 1st DCA 1975); Spradley v. Spradley, 312 So. 2d 215 (Fla. 1st DCA 1975); Nicholson v. Nicholson, 311 So. 2d 676 (Fla. 4th DCA 1975); Teta v. Teta, 297 So. 2d 642 (Fla. 1st DCA 1974), the prin…
• Koken v. Neubauer, 374 So. 2d 49 (Fla. 3d DCA 1979)
  …ised its discretion by ordering these custody provisions, and we cannot on appeal substitute our judgment for that of the trial court. See, e. g., Dinkel v. Dinkel, 322 So. 2d 22 (Fla.1975); Grant v. Corbitt, 95 So. 2d 25 (Fla.1957); Baker v. Baker, 360 So. 2d 19 (Fla. 4th DCA 1978); and Scheiner v. Scheiner, 336 So. 2d 406 (Fla. 3d DCA 1976). However, in regard to the change in the child support provisions, the record reflects that the trial court acted without the benefit of a proper motion, etc., before i…

Authorities Cited

• Frank J. Rooney, Inc. v. Charles W. Ackerman OF Fla., Inc., 219 So. 2d 110 (Fla. 3d DCA 1969)