ROBERT BROWNE, APPELLANT,
v.
MONUMENTAL PROPERTIES OF FLORIDA, INC., A FLORIDA CORPORATION D/B/A SOCIETY PARTK, N. E., MARYLAND CASUALTY COMPANY, A FOREIGN CORPORATION AND JAMES RUSSELL, APPELLEES
ROBERT BROWNE, APPELLANT,
MONUMENTAL PROPERTIES OF FLORIDA, INC., A FLORIDA CORPORATION D/B/A SOCIETY PARTK, N. E., MARYLAND CASUALTY COMPANY, A FOREIGN CORPORATION AND JAMES RUSSELL, APPELLEES
361 So. 2d 433
Florida District Court of Appeal, Fourth District (1978)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 5 cases
Opinion of the Court
BLACK, SUSAN H., Associate Judge.
Appellant, Robert Browne, takes his appeal from a Final Summary Judgment.
The court erred in granting the summary judgment as there was a substantial question of fact raised by the affidavit of Curtis Lee Elder, Jr. The affidavit raised a factual question of the appellee’s knowledge of the violent propensities of it’s employee as discussed in Mallory v. O’Neil, 69 So. 2d 313 (Fla.1954).
REVERSED AND REMANDED.
DAUKSCH and LETTS, JJ., concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Orestes Martell v. State, 676 So. 2d 1030 (Fla. 3d DCA 1996)…CA 1994)(Altenbernd, J., dissenting). These types of sentencing errors must either be raised on direct appeal or by a timely motion for post-conviction relief under Rule 3.850. See Young v. State, 616 So. 2d 1133 (Fla. 3d DCA 1993); Pegues v. State, 361 So. 2d 433 (Fla. 1st DCA 1978); Johnson v. State, 355 So. 2d 857 (Fla. 3d DCA 1978). Finally, we recognize that a court has the authority to convert a 3.800(a) action into a 3.850 proceeding in the interest of justice. DeSantis v. State, 400 So. 2d 525 (Fla.…
-
Durcan v. State, 383 So. 2d 248 (Fla. 3d DCA 1980)…nstitutional right to a jury trial. Sanford v. Rubin, 237 So. 2d 134 (Fla.1970); Jones v. State, 248 So. 2d 517 (Fla.3d DCA 1971); Clark v. State, 336 So. 2d 468 (Fla.2d DCA 1976); Ellison v. State, 349 So. 2d 731 (Fla.3d DCA 1977); Pegues v. State, 361 So. 2d 433 (Fla.1st DCA 1978); Clark v. State, 363 So. 2d 331 (Fla.1978); Rubin v. State, 368 So. 2d 69 (Fla.3d DCA 1979). Further, the trial court, in denying the Rule 1 motion, found that he had voluntarily waived his right to a jury trial at the time of the…
-
Scott v. State, 396 So. 2d 271 (Fla. 3d DCA 1981)…de by the trial judge during the jury selection process was not preserved for appellate review by a proper and timely objection, motion for mistrial, or request for corrective instruction, Foreman v. State, 47 So. 2d 308 (Fla.1958); Pegues v. State, 361 So. 2d 433 (Fla.1st DCA 1978); Flynn v. State, 351 So. 2d 377 (Fla.4th DCA 1977); McCrea v. State, 210 So. 2d 724 (Fla.3d DCA 1968); see also Mack v. State, 270 So. 2d 382 (Fla.3d DCA 1972), and the comments were not so pernicious as to cause us to recognize t…
Previewing 3 of 5 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligenceAuthorities Cited
- Mallory v. O'Neil, 69 So. 2d 313 (Fla. 1954)