LAURA HATFIELD, APPELLANT,
v.
RHETT HATFIELD, APPELLEE
Explore caselaw by topic → Browse Discretionary Rulings cases and more on FLexlaw
PER CURIAM.
The final judgment of marriage dissolution under review is affirmed upon a holding that: (a) the trial court on this record properly exercised its discretion in taking testimony on, and thereafter declining to approve a prior property settlement agreement between the parties, Harris v. Harris, 291 So. 2d 95 (Fla.1st DCA 1974); Risteen v. Risteen, 280 So. 2d 488 (Fla.3d DCA 1973); (b) the wife acquiesced in, and did not object to the court’s ruling on the taking of oral depositions1 and, accordingly did not properly preserve such ruling for appellate review, Karl v. David Ritter Sportsservice, Inc., 164 So. 2d 23 (Fla.3d DCA 1964); and (c) the awards to the wife and children were well within the trial court’s discretion to enter. Rosenberg v. Rosenberg, 371 So. 2d 672 (Fla.1979), adopting 352 So. 2d 867 (Fla.3d DCA 1977) (Hubbart, J., dissenting); Shaw v. Shaw, 334 So. 2d 13 (Fla.1976); Koeppel v. Koeppel, 351 So. 2d 766 (Fla.3d DCA 1977); Pfohl v. Pfohl, 345 So. 2d 371 (Fla.3d DCA 1977).
. It is noted that appellate counsel were not trial counsel.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Safie v. Safie, 416 So. 2d 485 (Fla. 3d DCA 1982)…d willfully failed to make such payments despite his then-present ability to do so.1 Garo v. Garo, 347 So. 2d 418 (Fla.1977); Faircloth v. Faircloth, 339 So. 2d 650 (Fla.1976); DuBois v. DuBois, 412 So. 2d 23 (Fla. 3d DCA 1982); Halpern v. Halpern, 384 So. 2d 889 (Fla. 3d DCA 1980); Blum v. Blum, 382 So. 2d 52 (Fla. 3d DCA 1980); Failla v. Fallia, 379 So. 2d 1329 (Fla. 3d DCA 1980); Murphy v. Murphy, 370 So. 2d 403 (Fla. 3d DCA 1979); Hamra v. Hamra, 350 So. 2d 538 (Fla. 3d DCA 1977). This deficiency in the…
-
Viltz v. Viltz, 384 So. 2d 1348 (Fla. 3d DCA 1980)…ve the United States with the child. Indeed, the record fairly reflects that he and his counsel acquiesced in this provision. We do not reach the merits of his first contention, since the issue was not properly preserved below. Hatfield v. Hatfield, 384 So. 2d 889 (Fla. 3d DCA 1980); Commodore Plaza at Century21, Etc. v. Cohen, 350 So. 2d 502 (Fla. 3d DCA 1977); Karl v. David Ritter, Sportser-vice, Inc., 164 So. 2d 23 (Fla. 3d DCA 1964); Collins v. Farley, 147 So. 2d 593 (Fla. 3d DCA 1962). We must, however,…
-
Rubin v. Rubin, 418 So. 2d 1065 (Fla. 3d DCA 1982)…The order contains the requisite finding that appellant wilfully failed to make such payments despite his then-present ability to do so, Garo v. Garo, 347 So. 2d 418 (Fla.1977); Faircloth v. Faircloth, 339 So. 2d 650 (Fla. 1976); Halpern v. Halpern, 384 So. 2d 889 (Fla. 3d DCA 1980); Murphy v. Murphy, 370 So. 2d 403 (Fla. 3d DCA 1979), cert. denied, 383 So. 2d 1199 (Fla.1980); Adams v. Adams, 357 So. 2d 264 (Fla. 3d DCA 1978), a finding supported by the evidence, and provides that appellant may purge himself…
Authorities Cited
- Shaw v. Shaw, 334 So. 2d 13 (Fla. 1976)
- Pfohl v. Pfohl, 345 So. 2d 371 (Fla. 3d DCA 1977)
- Oaklander v. Jules Oaklander, 351 So. 2d 766 (Fla. 3d DCA 1977)
- Rosenberg v. Rosenberg, 371 So. 2d 672 (Fla. 1979)
- Rosenberg v. Rosenberg, 352 So. 2d 867 (Fla. 3d DCA 1977)
- Frieda Karl and John Karl v. Ritter, 164 So. 2d 23 (Fla. 3d DCA 1964)
- Risteen v. Risteen, 280 So. 2d 488 (Fla. 3d DCA 1973)
- Harris v. Harris, 291 So. 2d 95 (Fla. 1st DCA 1974)