JUAN ANTONIO BORRERO, APPELLANT,
v.
THE STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE

Fla. 3d DCA | 1982-08-17
No. 81-907
Before HUBBART, C.J., and BARK-DULL and NESBITT, JJ.
418 So. 2d 1135 Florida District Court of Appeal, Third District (1982) Positive Treatment
Cited by 1 case

Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. Zirkle v. State, 410 So. 2d 948 (Fla. 3d DCA 1982); Davis v. State, 386 So. 2d 1287 (Fla. 3d DCA 1980); Chester v. State, 298 So. 2d 529 (Fla. 3d DCA 1974), cert. denied, 310 So. 2d 304 (Fla.1975).


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Cited By

  • Crown Cork & Seal Co., Inc. v. Vroom, 480 So. 2d 108 (Fla. 2d DCA 1985)
    …y, which is not at all clear, see Mercury Motors Express, Inc. v. Smith, 393 So. 2d 545 (Fla.1981); Adams v. Barnett Bank, 469 So. 2d 250 (Fla. 2d DCA 1985), no jury instruction regarding vicarious punitive damages was requested. See Geary v. Starr, 418 So. 2d 1135 (Fla. 4th DCA 1982). Actually, the main thrust of this contention may be to provide for vicarious punitive damages at the ordered new trial, but under our foregoing holding as to the order of a new trial this aspect becomes moot. We do not find mer…

Authorities Cited

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw