MARTHA MONNAR, APPELLANT,
v.
ENRIQUE MONNAR, APPELLEE

Fla. 3d DCA | 1982-11-30
No. 81-2226
Baskin, J.
422 So. 2d 362 Florida District Court of Appeal, Third District (1982)

AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.

Synopsis

Florida appellate court affirmed the trial court's denial of alimony and exclusion of personal injury settlement proceeds from marital property, but reversed provisions requiring the wife to bear all maintenance costs for jointly-owned condominium and the denial of attorney's fees.


Holding

A co-tenant in common must bear his proportionate share of mortgage payments and maintenance costs for jointly-owned property, and a spouse may recover attorney's fees in dissolution proceedings.


Headnotes

[1] A co-tenant in common in jointly-owned property must pay his proportionate share of mortgage payments and maintenance costs, or alternatively the other co-tenant may be c…

[2] Attorney's fees are recoverable in a dissolution of marriage action under Florida Statute § 61.16.

Previewing 2 of 2 headnotes on this case. FLexlaw’s editorially structured points of law — every proposition, pinpointed — are reserved for members.

Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence

Facts & Procedural History

Mr. and Mrs. Monnar divorced; the trial court awarded Mrs. Monnar exclusive possession of a condominium owned equally as tenants in common but require…

The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.

Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence

© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.


Opinion of the Court
BASKIN, Judge.

BASKIN, Judge.

We affirm the Final Judgment for Dissolution of Marriage in which the trial court found that Mrs. Monnar had no need for alimony and was not entitled to participate in settlement proceeds received as a consequence of Mr. Monnar’s personal injury action. In addition, we find no error in the trial court’s decision that the parties owned the condominium apartment equally as tenants in common, and permitting Mrs. Mon-nar to have exclusive possession. We reverse the provisions of the final judgment which require Mrs. Monnar to pay all expenses necessary to maintain the apartment. As co-tenant in common, Mr. Mon-nar is responsible for half the mortgage payments and interest costs. Connelly v. Connelly, 409 So. 2d 175 (Fla. 2d DCA 1982); Waskin v. Waskin, 346 So. 2d 1060 (Fla. 3d DCA 1977); Hendricks v. Hendricks, 312 So. 2d 792 (Fla. 3d DCA 1975). He must therefore pay a portion of past and future payments equal to his percentage of ownership, or, in the alternative, Mrs. Monnar should be credited at time of sale for sums she paid in excess of her share of the obligation. Dominik v. Dominik, 390 So. 2d 81 (Fla. 3d DCA 1980); Smith v. Smith, 390 So. 2d 1223 (Fla. 1st DCA 1980); accord Mahaffey v. Mahaffey, 401 So. 2d 1372 (Fla. 5th DCA 1981).

We reverse the portion of the final judgment denying Mrs. Monnar attorney’s fees. Canakaris v. Canakaris, 382 So. 2d 1197 (Fla.1980); Adler v. Adler, 418 So. 2d 1007 (Fla. 3d DCA 1982); Wilds v. Wilds, 399 So. 2d 1038 (Fla. 3d DCA 1981); § 61.16, Fla.Stat. (1979).

Affirmed in part, reversed in part, and remanded.


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Authorities Cited

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw