FRANCISCO MENDOZA-MARTINEZ, APPELLANT,
v.
ARGYLE R. MACKEY, COMMISSIONER OF IMMIGRATION AND NATURALIZATION AND HERBERT BROWNELL, ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE UNITED STATES, APPELLEES

9th Cir. | 1956-11-02
No. 14997
Before BONE, ORR and HAMLEY, Circuit Judges.
238 F.2d 239 United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit (1956) Positive Treatment
Cited by 4 cases

AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.


Holding

The court held that Section 401(j) of the Nationality Act of 1940 is constitutional.


Facts & Procedural History

Appellant was convicted of draft evasion and arrested for illegal entry based on expatriation under Section 401(j). He brought an action for declarato…

The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.

Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence

© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.


Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.

PER CURIAM.

Mendoza-Martinez appeals from an adverse judgment in an action for declaratory judgment in the United States District Court for the Southern District of California, Northern Division.

Appellant departed the United States in 1942 for Mexico and remained there until 1946. Upon his return to the United States, he was convicted for draft evasion under 50 U.S.C.A.Appendix, § 311.1 While in custody, appellant was arrested by the Immigration and Naturalization Service for illegal entry; the warrant alleged expatriation under Sec. 401 (j) of the Nationality Act of 1940, 54 Stat. 1168 (1940), as amended by 58 Stat. 746 (1944).2 The statute provided, in substance, for loss of United States nationality by departing from or remaining outside United States jurisdiction during a national emergency for the purpose of evading or avoiding military service.

After exhausting administrative remedies, appellant brought this action for declaratory relief. Appellant’s sole contention is that Sec. 401(j) is unconstitutional. This Court has twice held said section to be constitutional; on authority of Gonzalez v. Landon, 9 Cir., 1954, 215 F. 2d 955, reversed on other grounds 350 U.S. 920, 76 S.Ct. 210, and Vidales v. Brownell, 9 Cir., 1954, 217 F. 2d 136, the judgment of the District Court is affirmed.

. Now Universal Military Training and Service Act, 50 U.S.C.A.Appendix, § 462.

. Now Immigration and Nationality Act 1952, 8 U.S.C.A. § 1481(a).


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Cited By

Authorities Cited

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw