STATE FARM FIRE AND CASUALTY COMPANY, PETITIONER,
v.
SPENCER RAUENZAHN, ET UX., RESPONDENTS
Explore caselaw by topic → Browse Conflict Jurisdiction cases and more on FLexlaw
OVERTON, Justice.
This is a petition to review a decision of the Fourth District Court of Appeal reported as State Farm Fire and Casualty Co. v. Rauenzahn, 426 So. 2d 584 (Fla. 4th DCA 1983). We find direct conflict with Vetter v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co., 423 So. 2d 991 (Fla. 3d DCA 1982); Allstate Insurance Co. v. Alvarez, 414 So. 2d 224 (Fla. 3d DCA 1982); Indomenico v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co., 388 So. 2d 29 (Fla. 3d DCA 1980); State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co. v. Wimpee, 376 So. 2d 20 (Fla. 2d DCA 1979), cert. denied, 385 So. 2d 762 (Fla.1980); and State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co. v. Kuhn, 374 So. 2d 1079 (Fla. 3d DCA 1979), cert. denied, 383 So. 2d 1197 (Fla.1980). We have jurisdiction. Art. V, § 3(b)(3), Fla. Const. We have resolved this conflict in our decision in New Hampshire Insurance Group v. Harbach, 439 So. 2d 1383 (Fla.,1983). For the reasons expressed in that decision, we quash the decision of the district court in the instant case.
It is so ordered.
ALDERMAN, C.J., and BOYD, MCDONALD, EHRLICH and SHAW, JJ., concur. ADKINS, J., dissents.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Williams v. State, 447 So. 2d 442 (Fla. 5th DCA 1984)…extent that Ferby appeared to hold, as a matter of law, that failure to conduct pretrial investigation is permissible trial strategy, it has been superseded by subsequent opinions of the Florida Supreme Court and of this court. See Vaught v. State, 442 So. 2d 217 (Fla.1983); McMillian v. State, 411 So. 2d 1372 (Fla. 5th DCA 1982). Indeed, even when it first appeared, Ferby was in conflict with prior opinions from this court2 and from the Florida Supreme Court.3 The recent Vaught opinion concerned a 3.850 al…
-
Simmons v. State, 485 So. 2d 475 (Fla. 2d DCA 1986)…, is not sufficient evidence of prejudice. Weir v. State, supra. Notably, at the time Simmons entered his plea and for many years thereafter the effectiveness of private counsel could not be questioned in postconvietion proceedings. Vaught v. State, 442 So. 2d 217 (Fla.1983); Blatch v. State, 389 So. 2d 669 (Fla. 3d DCA 1980). However, every case must be judged on its facts and if the trial court has sufficient evidence that Simmons has deliberately abused the system, it may deny relief accordingly. This cau…
-
Smith v. State, 481 So. 2d 988 (Fla. 5th DCA 1986)…ed by affidavits of the indicated witnesses. The rule requires that the motion itself be sworn to by the movant, but there is no requirement either in the rule or in cases discussing it that there be supporting affidavits. See e.g., Vaught v. State, 442 So. 2d 217 (Fla.1983); Meeks v. State, 382 So. 2d 673 (Fla.1980). . See Knight v. State, 394 So. 2d 997 (Fla.1981).…
Previewing 3 of 7 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligenceAuthorities Cited
- State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co. v. Kuhn, 374 So. 2d 1079 (Fla. 3d DCA 1979)
- State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co. v. Wimpee, 376 So. 2d 20 (Fla. 2d DCA 1979)
- Indomenico v. State Farm Mut. Auto Ins. Co., 388 So. 2d 29 (Fla. 3d DCA 1980)
- Enmund v. State, 439 So. 2d 1383 (Fla. 1983)
- NEW Hampshire Ins. Grp. v. Harbach, 439 So. 2d 1383 (Fla. 1983)
- Allstate Ins. Co. v. Alvarez, 414 So. 2d 224 (Fla. 3d DCA 1982)
- Kinmon v. State, 414 So. 2d 224 (Fla. 4th DCA 1982)
- Vetter v. State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co., 423 So. 2d 991 (Fla. 3d DCA 1982)
- City OF Miami v. Fla. Retail Fed'n, Inc., 423 So. 2d 991 (Fla. 3d DCA 1982)
- State Farm Fire & Cas. Co. v. Rauenzahn, 426 So. 2d 584 (Fla. 4th DCA 1983)