ROBERT MARTIN, APPELLANT,
v.
FRED HOOVER AND BROWARD PLATING, INC., A FLORIDA CORPORATION, APPELLEES
ROBERT MARTIN, APPELLANT,
FRED HOOVER AND BROWARD PLATING, INC., A FLORIDA CORPORATION, APPELLEES
473 So. 2d 763
Florida District Court of Appeal, Fourth District (1985)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 16 cases
Opinion of the Court
DELL, Judge.
This appeal arises out of a final summary judgment in an action seeking dissolution of a partnership and an accounting, alleging a breach of contract, alleging fraud and misrepresentation, claiming recovery of wages, and requesting injunctive relief.
The record reveals that genuine issues of material fact exist as to appellant’s claims and as to appellees’ counterclaim. Accordingly, the final summary judgment in favor of appellee is reversed and this case is remanded to the trial court for further proceedings.
REVERSED and REMANDED.
HERSEY, C.J., and ANSTEAD, J., concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Johnson v. State, 477 So. 2d 56 (Fla. 5th DCA 1985)…t 1016. In a recent decision, the First District ruled that the criteria in section 39.111(6), Florida Statutes, impose a mandatory duty on the trial court to make a written statement before applying adult sanctions to juveniles. Franklin v. State, 473 So. 2d 763 (Fla. 1st DCA 1985). The facts in Franklin indicate that the trial court at sentencing expressed concern over the serious and violent nature of the juvenile’s offenses and the need to protect the community from future occurrences of similar conduct…
-
Franklin v. State, 476 So. 2d 1346 (Fla. 1st DCA 1985)…for trial to qualify for discharge, still requires a defendant to be “ready for trial.” There is no difference in meaning between the two phrases, and Owens was clearly not ready for trial during his competency determination. See Franklin v. State, 473 So. 2d 763, (Fla. 1st DCA, 1985). [*1348] The motions for judgment of acquittal were also correctly denied. It is true that, in McCray v. State, 358 So. 2d 615 (Fla. 1st DCA 1978), this court held that when a cigarette lighter resembling a gun was pointed at a…1 / 2
-
Fonte v. State, 515 So. 2d 1036 (Fla. 3d DCA 1987)…nstitutional right.” Blackstock, 461 So. 2d at 1022. We reject Fonte’s claim that he was placed in the untenable position of choosing between his constitutional right to a speedy trial2 and his constitutional right to counsel. See Franklin v. State, 473 So. 2d 763 (Fla. 1st DCA) (no constitutional violation where de [*1038] fendant was required to choose between waiver of speedy trial rights and competency evaluation), modified on other grounds, 473 So. 2d 763 (Fla. 1st DCA), appeal dismissed, Owens v. State,…1 / 2
Previewing 3 of 8 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence