THE STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLANT,
v.
JESUS PEREZ AND LAZARO PAZ, APPELLEES
THE STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLANT,
JESUS PEREZ AND LAZARO PAZ, APPELLEES
493 So. 2d 547
Florida District Court of Appeal, Third District (1986)
Caution
Cited by 6 cases
Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.
Of the two grounds upon which the trial court may arguably have granted the defendants-appellees’ motion to dismiss, one, the failure to produce the alleged confidential informant, is foreclosed by State v. Gonzalez Rodriguez, 483 So. 2d 807 (Fla. 3d DCA 1986), and cases cited; the other, based upon the fact that payment to the c.i. was contingent upon the quantity of drugs seized as a result of his efforts, is contrary to State v. Prieto, 479 So. 2d 320 (Fla. 3d DCA 1985). Accordingly, the order under review is reversed and the cause remanded for further proceedings.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
State v. Ruiz, 495 So. 2d 256 (Fla. 3d DCA 1986)…a witness at any stage of the trial of this case. Since the thrust of Glosson is clearly to prevent the introduction of testimony by the c.i. which may be tainted, if not perjured, as a result of his monetary interest in the outcome, State v. Perez, 493 So. 2d 547 (Fla. 3d DCA 1986); State v. Prieto, 479 So. 2d 320 (Fla. 3d DCA 1985), these representations — by which, of course, the state is and will be strictly bound, Finney v. State, 420 So. 2d 639 (Fla. 3d DCA 1981) (Pearson, J., specially concurring); Sal…
-
State v. Fernandez, 546 So. 2d 791 (Fla. 3d DCA 1989)…l informant was not to be offered at trial. There is ample post-Glosson case law to support this type of police action. See, e.g., Moore v. State, 498 So. 2d 612 (Fla. 5th DCA 1986); State v. Ruiz, 495 So. 2d 256 (Fla. 3d DCA 1986); State v. Perez, 493 So. 2d 547 (Fla. 3d DCA 1986); Lee v. State, 490 So. 2d 80 (Fla. 1st DCA 1986); State v. [*794] Prieto, 479 So. 2d 320 (Pla. 3d DCA 1985); Yolman v. State, 473 So. 2d 716 (Fla. 2d DCA 1985). Accordingly, we reverse and reinstate.…
-
Martin v. Martin, 734 So. 2d 1133 (Fla. 4th DCA 1999)…error in failing to prohibit the wife from moving out of state. The husband did not [*1136] request such relief, and orders restricting relocation fall under the same abuse of discretion standard, which has not been met here. See Carrero v. Carrero, 493 So. 2d 547, 548 (Fla. 3d DCA 1986). The trial court’s order provided for the appointment of a mediator to work out a visitation schedule between the parties and the child. The order stated “[t]he mediator shall have absolute authority to establish a visitatio…
Authorities Cited
- State v. Rodriguez, 483 So. 2d 807 (Fla. 3d DCA 1986)
- State v. Prieto, 479 So. 2d 320 (Fla. 3d DCA 1985)
- Bart Wiener v. Pope, 479 So. 2d 320 (Fla. 3d DCA 1985)