MORTON AROLL, SHOSHANA AROLL, AND VICKI DRUCKER, APPELLANTS,
v.
ITT COMMERCIAL FINANCE CORP., A DELAWARE CORPORATION, APPELLEE
PER CURIAM.
Appellee having confessed error, we reverse the summary final judgment and remand the cause to the trial court for further proceedings. Mooney v. Integon Life Insurance Corp., 368 So. 2d 957 (Fla. 3d DCA 1979).
Reversed and remanded.
BARKDULL and BASKIN, JJ., concur.
FERGUSON, Judge
(concurring).
In reversing we hold that it is error to enter a summary judgment where the motion and supporting affidavits fail to controvert the affirmative defenses. O’Neal v. Brady, 476 So. 2d 294 (Fla. 3d DCA 1985) (in order for plaintiff to obtain summary-judgment where defendant asserts affirmative defenses, plaintiff must either disprove those defenses by evidence or establish their legal insufficiency); Proprietor’s Insurance v. Siegel, 410 So. 2d 993 (Fla. 3d DCA 1982) (same).
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Cufferi v. Royal Palm Dev. Co., Inc., 516 So. 2d 983 (Fla. 4th DCA 1987)…... to obtain a summary judgment when the defendant asserts affirmative defenses, the plaintiff must either disprove those defenses by evidence or establish the legal insufficiency of the defenses. Id. at 127. Aroll v. ITT Commercial Finance Corp., 496 So. 2d 1011 (Fla. 3d DCA 1986); O’Neal v. Brady, 476 So. 2d 294 (Fla. 3d DCA 1985); First Mortgage Investors v. Boulevard National Bank of Miami, 327 So. 2d 830 (Fla. 3d DCA 1976); Howdeshell v. First National Bank of Clearwater, 369 So. 2d 432 (Fla. 2d DCA 197…
-
Anderson v. Redden, 505 So. 2d 22 (Fla. 3d DCA 1987)…ely obviate the affirmative defense of fraud. See Nagelbush v. United Postal Savings Ass’n, 504 So. 2d 782 (Fla. 3d DCA 1987); Holly Hill Acres, Ltd. v. Charter Bank, 314 So. 2d 209 (Fla. 2d DCA 1975); see also Aroll v. ITT Commercial Finance Corp., 496 So. 2d 1011 (Fla. 3d DCA 1986); O’Neal v. Brady, 476 So. 2d 294 (Fla. 3d DCA 1985); Proprietors Ins. v. Siegel, 410 So. 2d 993 (Fla. 3d DCA 1982).…
-
Edmundo Luna v. Total Mortg., Ltd., 533 So. 2d 900 (Fla. 3d DCA 1988)…trial court erred in entering final summary judgment. See First Nat ’l Entertainment Corp. v. Brumlik, 531 So. 2d 403 (Fla. 5th DCA 1988); Mathews v. Dime Sav. Bank of New York, 507 So. 2d 1196 (Fla. 3d DCA 1987); Aroll v. ITT Commercial Fin. Corp., 496 So. 2d 1011 (Fla. 3d DCA 1986); O’Neal v. Brady, 476 So. 2d 294 (Fla. 3d DCA 1985). REVERSED AND REMANDED.…
Authorities Cited
- Foust v. State, 410 So. 2d 993 (Fla. 3d DCA 1982)
- O'Neal v. Brady, 476 So. 2d 294 (Fla. 3d DCA 1985)
- The Celotex Corp. v. Buildex, Inc., 476 So. 2d 294 (Fla. 3d DCA 1985)
- Lopez v. Allstate Ins. Co., 368 So. 2d 957 (Fla. 3d DCA 1979)