MARIE I. ANDERSON AND ERNEST ANDERSON, APPELLANTS,
v.
WILLIE REDDEN, JR., APPELLEE
MARIE I. ANDERSON AND ERNEST ANDERSON, APPELLANTS,
WILLIE REDDEN, JR., APPELLEE
505 So. 2d 22
Florida District Court of Appeal, Third District (1987)
Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.
The summary judgment below is reversed because the plaintiff-movant did not conclusively obviate the affirmative defense of fraud. See Nagelbush v. United Postal Savings Ass’n, 504 So. 2d 782 (Fla. 3d DCA 1987); Holly Hill Acres, Ltd. v. Charter Bank, 314 So. 2d 209 (Fla. 2d DCA 1975); see also Aroll v. ITT Commercial Finance Corp., 496 So. 2d 1011 (Fla. 3d DCA 1986); O’Neal v. Brady, 476 So. 2d 294 (Fla. 3d DCA 1985); Proprietors Ins. v. Siegel, 410 So. 2d 993 (Fla. 3d DCA 1982).
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Authorities Cited
- Foust v. State, 410 So. 2d 993 (Fla. 3d DCA 1982)
- O'Neal v. Brady, 476 So. 2d 294 (Fla. 3d DCA 1985)
- The Celotex Corp. v. Buildex, Inc., 476 So. 2d 294 (Fla. 3d DCA 1985)
- Holly Hill Acres, Ltd. v. Charter Bank OF Gainesville, 314 So. 2d 209 (Fla. 2d DCA 1975)
- Morton Aroll v. ITT Commercial Fin. Corp., 496 So. 2d 1011 (Fla. 3d DCA 1986)
- Nagelbush v. Capozzi and Margaret A. Capozzi, 504 So. 2d 782 (Fla. 3d DCA 1987)