HARVEY GOODMAN, APPELLANT,
v.
DREXEL BURNHAM LAMBERT, INC., AND THEODORE J. BUTLER, APPELLEES
Explore caselaw by topic → Browse Manifest Weight Of The Evidence cases and more on FLexlaw
PER CURIAM.
Appellant argues that 1) the successor judge, who was not present at trial and who was therefore unable to observe the alleged prejudicial conduct of appellee’s attorney, erred in denying appellant’s post-trial motions; 2) the trial court erred in allowing appellee to pose a hypothetical question based on facts allegedly not in evidence; and 3) the jury verdict was against the manifest weight of the evidence. Finding no merit in these claims, Ed Ricke & Sons, Inc. v. Green, 468 So. 2d 908 (Fla.1985); Martin v. Sussman, 82 So. 2d 597 (Fla.1955); Linehan v. Everett, 338 So. 2d 1294 (Fla. 1st DCA 1976); Better Const., Inc. v. Camacho Enterprises, Inc., 311 So. 2d 766 (Fla. 3d DCA), cert. denied, 325 So. 2d 8 (Fla.1975); Dixie-Bell Oil Co. v. Gold, 275 So. 2d 19 (Fla. 3d DCA 1973); see Griffis v. Hill, 230 So. 2d 143 (Fla.1969); Steiger v. Massachusetts Casualty Ins. Co., 273 So. 2d 4 (Fla. 3d DCA 1973), we affirm.
Affirmed.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Authorities Cited
- Griffis v. Hill, 230 So. 2d 143 (Fla. 1969)
- ED Ricke & Sons, Inc. v. Green, 468 So. 2d 908 (Fla. 1985)
- LEE v. State, 275 So. 2d 19 (Fla. 1st DCA 1973)
- Steiger v. Mass. Cas. Ins. Co., 273 So. 2d 4 (Fla. 3d DCA 1973)
- Better Constr., Inc. v. Camacho Enters., Inc., 311 So. 2d 766 (Fla. 3d DCA 1975)
- Martin v. Sussman, 82 So. 2d 597 (Fla. 1955)
- Buckels v. State, 325 So. 2d 8 (Fla. 1975)
- Camacho Enter., Inc. v. Better Constr., Inc., 325 So. 2d 8 (Fla. 1975)
- Linehan v. Everett, 338 So. 2d 1294 (Fla. 1st DCA 1976)