U.S. PORCELAIN, INC., APPELLANT,
v.
JEAN PIERRE BRETON AND C B & B ENTERPRISES, INC., APPELLEES
AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.
The court held that the trial court lacked jurisdiction to enter a dismissal with prejudice after a voluntary dismissal had been filed by mail.
Appellant mailed a voluntary dismissal to the court, which was filed three days later. The trial court, unaware of the dismissal, held a hearing and e…
The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.
STONE, Judge.
The attorney for appellant mailed a voluntary dismissal to the court on October 14th, and certified that a copy had been mailed to appellees’ counsel on that date. The court’s copy arrived and was filed by the clerk on October 17th.
Appellant’s attorney advised the office of appellees’ counsel by telephone on the 14th that the dismissal was being taken. Consequently, he did not attend a hearing for discovery violation sanctions on the following day, October 15th. At that hearing, the trial court entered a dismissal with prejudice as a sanction, entered judgment for appellees, and awarded attorney’s fees. It is undisputed that appellees’ attorney’s office was notified that the dismissal was being filed, and the court was advised accordingly. Nevertheless, the trial court denied appellant’s motion to set aside the sanctions.
Rule 1.080(b), Florida Rules of Civil Procedure, provides that service by mail is complete upon mailing. This provision governs the service of a notice of voluntary dismissal. Marine Contractors, Inc. v. Armco, Inc., 452 So. 2d 77 (Fla. 2d DCA 1984). The trial court was therefore without jurisdiction to enter the order of October 15, 1986. See Randle — Eastern Ambulance Service, Inc. v. Vasta, 360 So. 2d 68 (Fla.1978); Fla.R.Civ.P. 1.420(a).
The certification by counsel of service is prima facie evidence of the date of mailing. Gavin v. Gavin, 456 So. 2d 535 (Fla. 1st DCA 1984); Fla.R.Civ.P. 1.080(f). There was no evidence to contradict appellant’s counsel. Thus, Select Builders of Florida, Inc. v. Wong, 367 So. 2d 1089 (Fla. 3d DCA 1979), is distinguishable. There are no findings nor conclusions in this case of fraud, deception, irregularities, nor any misleading of the court.
Accordingly, the order imposing sanctions dated October 15, 1985, and the final judgment dated December 4, 1985, are reversed and vacated. The cause is remanded for further proceedings.
DELL and GUNTHER, JJ., concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Pino v. The Bank OF NEW York Mellon, 57 So. 3d 950 (Fla. 4th DCA 2011)…Builders to explicitly hold that “affirmative relief’ is required to establish grounds under' rule 1.540(b) for relief from a voluntary dismissal done to prevent examination into an attempted fraud on the court.5 In U.S. Porcelain, Inc. v. Breton, 502 So. 2d 1379 (Fla. 4th DCA 1987), we tacitly recognized the Select Builders exception but found it inapplicable where “[t]here are no findings nor conclusions in this case of fraud, deception, irregularities, nor any misleading of the court.” 502 So. 2d at 1380.…
-
Abbar v. Abdelraham A. Abbar, 560 So. 2d 422 (Fla. 4th DCA 1990)…PER CURIAM. AFFIRMED. See U.S. Porcelain, Inc. v. Breton, 502 So. 2d 1379 (Fla. 4th DCA 1987). HERSEY, C.J., and DOWNEY and WARNER, JJ., concur.…
-
Republic Nat'l Bank OF Miami v. Tatiana Ramirez-Limon, 514 So. 2d 5 (Fla. 3d DCA 1987)…PER CURIAM. Affirmed. U.S. Porcelain, Inc. v. Breton, 502 So. 2d 1379 (Fla. 4th DCA 1987); Simmons v. Schimmel, 476 So. 2d 1342 (Fla. 3d DCA 1985), review denied, 486 So. 2d 597 (Fla.1986).…
Authorities Cited
- Randle-Eastern Ambulance Serv., Inc. v. Vasta, 360 So. 2d 68 (Fla. 1978)
- Select Builders OF Fla., Inc. v. Wong, 367 So. 2d 1089 (Fla. 3d DCA 1979)
- Gavin v. Gavin, 456 So. 2d 535 (Fla. 1st DCA 1984)
- Marine Contractors, Inc. v. Armco, Inc., 452 So. 2d 77 (Fla. 2d DCA 1984)