WALDRON

v.

COLUMBIA COUNTY JAIL

Plaintiff, Trey Waldron, a sentenced State prisoner confined at the Columbia County Jail (CCJ), initiated this action on April 13, 2023, by filing a pro se complaint for the violation of civil rights under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (Doc. 1; Compl.). He is proceeding as a pauper. See Order (Doc. 4). In his complaint, Plaintiff alleges a CCJ medical provider, Nurse McCullan, was “unqualified” and misdiagnosed his sexually transmitted disease as herpes (rather than syphilis), thus prescribing the wrong medication, which made him sick and cost him money. See Compl. at 4-5. Plaintiff acknowledges a urologist eventually correctly diagnosed him and prescribed appropriate medication. Id. It appears the correct diagnosis was made within a month, but the precise timeline is unclear. See id. Plaintiff alleges an officer, Deputy Ward, was present during the medical exam conducted by Nurse McCullan and “verbally, sexauly [sic] assaulted” Plaintiff by “jacking his [own penis] and spanking his [own] ass.” Id. at 4-5. As relief,

Plaintiff seeks relief from the charges placed on his jail account for the wrong medicine and lab tests, compensatory and punitive damages, and for Defendants to be fired. Id. at 5. Upon review, the Court finds Plaintiff’s complaint does not satisfy the minimal federal pleading standards and is otherwise deficient. The Federal Rules of Civil Procedure require a plaintiff to provide “a short and plain statement of the claim showing that [he] is entitled to relief.” Fed. R. Civ. P. 8(a)(2). All averments of the claim should be made “in numbered paragraphs,

each limited as far as practicable to a single set of circumstances.” Fed. R. Civ. P. 10(b). To survive dismissal, a complaint must allege facts that, accepted as true, state a claim “that is plausible on its face.” Ashcroft v. Iqbal, 556 U.S. 662, 678 (2009). The standard asks for less than a probability but “more than a sheer possibility that a defendant has acted unlawfully.” Id. Though a plaintiff is not required to provide “detailed factual allegations,” he must offer more than “naked assertion[s] devoid of further factual enhancement.” Id. (internal quotation marks omitted). He should provide enough detail to “give the defendant fair notice of what the ... claim is and the grounds upon which it rests.” Bell Atl. Corp. v. Twombly, 550 U.S. 544,

555 (2007) (alteration in original). A court must hold a pro se plaintiff to a less stringent standard than a lawyer, Tannenbaum v. United States, 148 F. 3d

1262, 1263 (11th Cir. 1998), but may not rewrite a deficient complaint for a pro se plaintiff or otherwise serve as his de facto counsel, GJR Invs., Inc. v. Cnty. of Escambia, 132 F. 3d 1359, 1369 (11th Cir. 1998), overruled on other grounds by Iqbal, 556 U.S. 662.

Plaintiff’s complaint is deficient for at least two reasons. First, the Defendants he intends to sue are unclear. On the first page of the complaint form, Plaintiff identifies the Defendants as “[CCJ] Et.al [sic],” but in sections I (“The Parties”), II (“Basis for Jurisdiction”), and IV (“Statement of Claim”), he names and lodges allegations against only Deputy Ward and Nurse McCullan. See Compl. at 1, 2, 4. To the extent Plaintiff intended to name the CCJ as a Defendant, he is advised that a sheriff’s office or jail is not a legal entity subject to suit in a civil rights action brought under § 1983. Faulkner v. Monroe Cnty.

Sheriff’s Dep’t, 523 F. App’x 696, 701 (11th Cir. 2013) (affirming dismissal of the sheriff’s office because that entity did not have “the capacity to be sued”).¹ Second, Plaintiff fails to adequately set forth his claim against Nurse McCullan. To state a claim under § 1983, a plaintiff must allege that a person

‘so grossly incompetent, inadequate, or excessive as to shock the conscience or to be intolerable to fundamental fairness.’” Harris v. Thigpen, 941 F. 2d 1495, 1505 (11th Cir. 1991). If Plaintiff wants to proceed, he must file an amended complaint that complies with the standards discussed above, the instructions on the enclosed complaint form, and the instructions that follow. 1. The amended complaint must be marked, “Amended Complaint.”

2. The amended complaint must name as defendants only those who had been acting under color of state law and are responsible for an alleged constitutional violation.

3. The amended complaint must state the full name and address (i.e., work location) of each defendant (to the extent known) in the style of the case on the first page and in section I.B.

4. The list of defendants named on the first page must match the list in section I.B.

5. In section IV, “Statement of Claim,” there must be a clear description of how each defendant was involved in the alleged violation. The allegations should be stated in numbered paragraphs, each limited to a single set of circumstances. Plaintiff should separately explain the facts giving rise to his individual claims for relief, and he should clearly state how each defendant is responsible for each alleged violation.²

6. In section V, “Injuries,” there must be a statement concerning how each defendant’s action(s) or omission(s) injured Plaintiff.

7. In section VI, “Relief,” there must be a statement of what Plaintiff seeks through this action.3

Plaintiff must sign and date the amended complaint after the following statement on the form: Under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 11, by signing below, I certify to the best of my knowledge, information, and belief that this complaint: (1) is not being presented for an improper purpose, such as to harass, cause unnecessary delay, or needlessly increase the cost of litigation; (2) is supported by

Before signing the amended complaint, Plaintiff must ensure his assertions are truthful and he has not knowingly made false material declarations. He must neither exaggerate nor distort the facts but instead must truthfully state the facts underlying his claims. Knowingly making a false material declaration in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 1623 is punishable by a fine, imprisonment, or both. An amended complaint supersedes the filing of the initial complaint and becomes the operative pleading. Krinsk v. SunTrust Banks, Inc., 654 F. 3d 1194, 1202 (11th Cir. 2011). Thus, Plaintiff’s amended complaint must be complete, including all related claims he wishes to raise and must not refer back to his original complaint. Accordingly, it is now ORDERED: 1. The Clerk shall send Plaintiff a civil rights complaint form.

2. By June 6, 2023, Plaintiff must mail an amended complaint to the Court for filing. The amended complaint should comply with the instructions on the form and those provided in this order. Plaintiffs failure to comply with this order may result in the dismissal of this case. DONE AND ORDERED at Jacksonville, Florida, this 24 day of May, 20238.

: MONTE C. RICHARDSON

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Jax-6 C: Trey U. Waldron