KENNETH E. BOWMAN, APPELLANT,
v.
STATE FARM MUTUAL AUTOMOBILE INSURANCE COMPANY, APPELLEE
KENNETH E. BOWMAN, APPELLANT,
STATE FARM MUTUAL AUTOMOBILE INSURANCE COMPANY, APPELLEE
599 So. 2d 273
Florida District Court of Appeal, Fifth District (1992)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 4 cases
Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.
Bowman appeals from an order which merely granted State Farm's motion for summary judgment. Since this is not an appealable order, we dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction. See Arcangeli v. Albertson's, Inc., 550 So. 2d 557 (Fla. 5th DCA 1989).
W. SHARP, PETERSON and DIAMANTIS, JJ., concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
McQUAIG v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc., 789 So. 2d 1215 (Fla. 1st DCA 2001)…la. RApp. P. After consideration of the appellants’ response, we dismiss this appeal. An order which merely grants a motion for summary judgment, without more, is not an appealable final order. See Bowman v. State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. [*1216] Co., 599 So. 2d 273 (Fla. 5th DCA 1992). In the August 16, 2000 Final Summary Judgment, the trial court did more than merely granting the appellee’s motion. The court made findings of fact and conclusions of law and ordered that “final summary judgment is hereby entere…
-
State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co. v. Open MRI OF Orlando, Inc., 780 So. 2d 339 (Fla. 5th DCA 2001)…he cause, and nothing remains to be done by the court to effectuate a termination of the cause as between the parties directly affected”); P. Padovano, Florida Appellate Practice § 21.2 (2d ed.1997). Compare Bowman v. State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co., 599 So. 2d 273 (Fla. 5th DCA 1992) (an order that merely grants a motion for summary judgment is not an appealable order). To be sure, the order of April 7, 2000 includes additional language of finality that was not present in the earlier judgment of October 18,…
Authorities Cited
- Kramer v. State, 550 So. 2d 557 (Fla. 5th DCA 1989)
- Arcangeli v. Albertson's, Inc., 550 So. 2d 557 (Fla. 5th DCA 1989)