RONALD RUDY VINCENT, APPELLANT,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
Explore caselaw by topic → Browse Written Sentencing Order cases and more on FLexlaw
[*1293] PER CURIAM.
This cause is before us on appeal from a judgment and sentence. Appellant contends that (1) the trial court erred in imposing incarceration as a condition of community control, and (2) the trial court erred in adding conditions of probation which were not announced orally. We affirm, without discussion, the first issue, and reverse and remand for resentencing on the second issue.
Condition 13 of the written community control order requires an hourly accounting of all appellant’s activities on a daily log. Condition 20 of the written community control order requires payment of one dollar per month to First Step of Bay County. Condition 10 of the written probation order requires payment of one dollar per month to First Step of Bay County. These conditions were not announced orally at sentencing, are not standard conditions of probation/eommunity control [i.e., those listed in Section 948.03, Florida Statutes], and must be stricken. Cumbie v. State, 597 So. 2d 946 (Fla. 1st DCA 1992).
Accordingly, the judgment is affirmed and the sentence is reversed and remanded for proceedings consistent herewith.
BOOTH, WIGGINTON and WEBSTER, JJ., concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Shacraha v. State, 635 So. 2d 1051 (Fla. 4th DCA 1994)…itions of community control/probation. § 948.03, Fla.Stat. (1991). We agree that these conditions must be stricken for failure to orally pronounce them at sentencing. These same conditions of community control have been stricken in Vincent v. State, 600 So. 2d 1292 (Fla. 1st DCA 1992) and Evans v. State, 605 So. 2d 1016 (Fla. 1st DCA 1992). By the state’s argument, we perceive that it (and perhaps the trial court) misconstrues what must be orally pronounced at sentencing. All special conditions of probation mu…
-
R.L. Gammon v. State, 738 So. 2d 980 (Fla. 1st DCA 1999)…man v. State, 600 So. 2d 551, 552-53 (Fla. 2d DCA 1992). On remand, the trial court shall enter an order of probation consistent with the oral pronouncement made at sentencing. See State v. Williams, 712 So. 2d 762, 764 (Fla.1998); Vincent v. State, 600 So. 2d 1292, 1293 (Fla. 1st DCA 1992); Shaddix v. State, 599 So. 2d 269, 270-71 (Fla. 1st DCA 1992). ALLEN, LAWRENCE, and BENTON, JJ„ CONCUR.…
-
Evans v. State, 605 So. 2d 1016 (Fla. 1st DCA 1992)…t of this appeal except (1) that portion of the orders which require appellant to “pay $1.00 per month to First Step, Inc. of Bay County as directed” is hereby stricken, see Shaddix v. State, 599 So. 2d 269 (Fla. 1st DCA 1992), and Vincent v. State, 600 So. 2d 1292 (Fla. 1st DCA 1992); (2) the phrase “at your own expense” is hereby stricken from condition (19) of the community control order, see Cumbie v. State, 597 So. 2d 946, 947 (Fla. 1st DCA 1992); (3) the condition of community control requiring appellant…
Previewing 3 of 6 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligenceAuthorities Cited
- Cumbie v. State, 597 So. 2d 946 (Fla. 1st DCA 1992)