WILLIAM M. EVANS, APPELLANT,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
Explore caselaw by topic → Browse Oral Pronouncement Of Sentence Conditions cases and more on FLexlaw
PER CURIAM.
We affirm the written orders of probation and community control that are the subject of this appeal except (1) that portion of the orders which require appellant to “pay $1.00 per month to First Step, Inc. of Bay County as directed” is hereby stricken, see Shaddix v. State, 599 So. 2d 269 (Fla. 1st DCA 1992), and Vincent v. State, 600 So. 2d 1292 (Fla. 1st DCA 1992); (2) the phrase “at your own expense” is hereby stricken from condition (19) of the community control order, see Cumbie v. State, 597 So. 2d 946, 947 (Fla. 1st DCA 1992); (3) the condition of community control requiring appellant to “participate in self-improvement programs” was not orally pronounced at sentencing and is hereby stricken, see Arnold v. State, 596 So. 2d 486 (Fla. 2nd DCA 1992).
Affirmed as modified.
ERVIN, MINER and WOLF, JJ„ concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Shacraha v. State, 635 So. 2d 1051 (Fla. 4th DCA 1994)…t. (1991). We agree that these conditions must be stricken for failure to orally pronounce them at sentencing. These same conditions of community control have been stricken in Vincent v. State, 600 So. 2d 1292 (Fla. 1st DCA 1992) and Evans v. State, 605 So. 2d 1016 (Fla. 1st DCA 1992). By the state’s argument, we perceive that it (and perhaps the trial court) misconstrues what must be orally pronounced at sentencing. All special conditions of probation must be orally pronounced at sentencing. Cumbie v. State,…
-
Moriber v. Dreiling, 194 So. 3d 369 (Fla. 3d DCA 2016)…se "[a] party entering into a transaction is not entitled to rely blindly on the opposing party’s representation where, as here, the relationship between the parties has been plagued with distrust”); see also Pepper v. First Union Nat. Bank of Fla., 605 So. 2d 1016, 1017 (Fla. 1st DCA 1992) ("Pepper is precluded, as a matter of law, from .defending against the enforcement of the release based on his claim of fraudulent inducement, because, due to the hostile and antagonistic relationship that existed between h…
-
Brown v. Keystone State Bank, 614 So. 2d 38 (Fla. 1st DCA 1993)…PER CURIAM. AFFIRMED. Pepper v. First Union Nat’l Bank of Florida, 605 So. 2d 1016 (Fla. 1st DCA 1992). WIGGINTON, MINER and WOLF, JJ., concur.…
Previewing 3 of 5 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligenceAuthorities Cited
- Cumbie v. State, 597 So. 2d 946 (Fla. 1st DCA 1992)
- Shaddix v. State, 599 So. 2d 269 (Fla. 1st DCA 1992)
- Vincent v. State, 600 So. 2d 1292 (Fla. 1st DCA 1992)
- Arnold v. State, 596 So. 2d 486 (Fla. 2d DCA 1992)