NISA VICHAIKUL, APPELLANT,
v.
S.C.A.C. ENTERPRISES, INC., APPELLEE

Fla. 2d DCA | 1993-03-19
No. 92-00813
SCHOONOVER and THREADGILL, JJ„ concur.
616 So. 2d 100 Florida District Court of Appeal, Second District (1993) Positive Treatment
Cited by 16 cases


Opinion of the Court
RYDER, Acting Chief Judge.

RYDER, Acting Chief Judge.

Nisa Vichaikul questions the trial court’s order granting the appellee’s motion for summary judgment on its complaint and on Vichaikul’s counterclaim. We hold that summary final judgment was improper: genuine issues of material fact remain unresolved. Moore v. Morris, 475 So. 2d 666 (Fla.1985); Holl v. Talcott, 191 So. 2d 40 (Fla.1966).

We agree with appellant that a failure of consideration is a defense to the contract. Howdeskell v. First National Bank of Clearwater, 369 So. 2d 432 (Fla. 2d DCA 1979). The affirmative defense of fraud is usually considered a jury question. L & S Food Services, Inc. v. Roberts Cafeteria, Inc., 422 So. 2d 45 (Fla. 2d DCA 1982). There remains a factual dispute as to whether Vichaikul’s agents relied upon the advertisement in advising her to enter into the contract in dispute.

Reversed and remanded for further proceedings consistent with this opinion.

SCHOONOVER and THREADGILL, JJ„ concur.


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Cited By

  • Global Travel Mktg., Inc. v. Shea, 908 So. 2d 392 (Fla. 2005)
    …y Mazzoni Farms, 761 So. 2d at 311 (recognizing public policy limitation on choice of law provision in contract); Powertel, Inc., 743 So. 2d at 577 (holding arbitration clause in service contract unconscionable); Vichaikul v. S.C.A.C. Enters., Inc., 616 So. 2d 100, 100 (Fla. 2d DCA 1993) (“[Fjailure of consideration is a defense to the contract.”). In determining whether to compel arbitration pursuant to the parties’ agreement, a court must consider three elements: (1) whether a valid written agreement to arb…
  • Justice Anthony Neal v. State, 669 So. 2d 1113 (Fla. 1st DCA 1996)
    …for the offenses of which appellant had been convicted is 4½ years. Therefore, the two consecutive sentences imposed which, together, add up to 5½ years, must be vacated, and the cases remanded for resentencing within the guidelines. Kelly v. State, 616 So. 2d 100 (Fla. 1st DCA 1993). The state correctly argues that it was not error to impose costs attributable to the law library and the Gulf Coast Criminal Justice Assessment, as those costs were established by a special act which was published in the Laws o…
  • Alphonso LEE v. State, 677 So. 2d 41 (Fla. 1st DCA 1996)
    …ed this sentence to be a departure sentence, the trial court may, on remand, consider whether a departure sentence is appropriate, and if so, set forth valid reasons for the departure. State v. Betancourt, 552 So. 2d 1107 (Fla.1989); Kelly v. State, 616 So. 2d 100 (Fla. 1st DCA 1993). As part of his sentence, the trial court imposed various costs, including $350 for the Florida Crime Lab, $50 for the Crimes Compensation Trust Fund, and $2 for Criminal Justice Education. We address each of these costs in turn…

Previewing 3 of 8 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.

Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence

Authorities Cited

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw