F.M., A JUVENILE, APPELLANT,
v.
THE STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE

Fla. 3d DCA | 1993-06-08
No. 93-285
Before BASKIN, COPE and GERSTEN, JJ.
619 So. 2d 28 Florida District Court of Appeal, Third District (1993) Positive Treatment
Cited by 1 case

Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. See State v. Stephens, 601 So. 2d 1195 (Fla.1992); Daniels v. State, 587 So. 2d 460 (Fla.1991); D.G. v. State, 547 So. 2d 295 (Fla. 3d DCA 1989); State v. Fort, 380 So. 2d 534 (Fla. 5th DCA 1980).


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Cited By

  • Harper v. Fla. Parole Comm'n, 626 So. 2d 336 (Fla. 1st DCA 1993)
    …mmission cannot change or modify a PPRD except for new information not available at the time of the initial interview, institutional conduct, or exceptional circumstances. §§ 947.16(5) & 947.173(3), Fla.Stat. (1991); Hester v. Florida Parole Comm’n, 619 So. 2d 28 (Fla. 1st DCA 1993); Williams v. Florida Parole & Probation Comm’n, 515 So. 2d 1044 (Fla. 1st DCA 1987); Jackson v. Florida Parole Comm’n, 424 So. 2d 930 (Fla. 1st DCA 1983); Gaines v. Florida Parole & Probation Comm’n, 463 So. 2d 1181 (Fla. 4th DCA…

Authorities Cited

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw