DANIEL CONLEY, APPELLANT,
v.
SHUTTS & BOWEN, P.A., AND MARK BISBING, APPELLEES

Fla. 3d DCA | 1993-08-03
No. 92-2317
Before SCHWARTZ, C.J., and BARKDULL and COPE, JJ.
622 So. 2d 559 Florida District Court of Appeal, Third District (1993) Positive Treatment
Cited by 2 cases

AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.


Holding

The trial court lacked jurisdiction to award attorneys' fees after dismissing the complaint without reserving jurisdiction, and the motion for fees lacked merit.


Facts & Procedural History

While an appeal of a dismissal order was pending, the trial court awarded attorneys' fees under Section 57.105, Florida Statutes. The prior appeal aff…

The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.

Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence

© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.


Opinion of the Court
BARKDULL, Judge.

BARKDULL, Judge.

During pendency of an appeal questioning the validity of a final order dismissing an amended complaint (with no reservation of jurisdiction to entertain a motion for attorneys’ fees)1 the trial court awarded attorneys’ fees pursuant to Section 57.105, Florida Statutes. The appeal of the final order of dismissal resulted in a five page opinion of this court. See Conley v. Shutts & Bowen, P.A., 616 So. 2d 523 (Fla. 3d DCA 1993), which affirmed the dismissal. The instant appeal involves the validity of the attorneys' fees award. We reverse.

First, because without a reservation of jurisdiction the trial court was without jurisdiction to entertain the motion for attorneys’ fees, see and compare Cibula v. Cibula, 578 So. 2d 519 (Fla. 4th DCA 1991); Patin v. Popino, 459 So. 2d 435 (Fla. 3d DCA 1984), and second, the motion lacked merit as it is apparent from this court’s opinion that the plaintiff’s amended complaint was not frivolous. Whitten v. Progressive Casualty Insurance Go., 410 So. 2d 501 (Fla.1982); Neuromed, Inc. v. Florida Energy Management Services, Inc., 600 So. 2d 479 (Fla. 4th DCA 1992).

The order under review is reversed with directions to vacate the order awarding attorneys’ fees.

Reversed with directions.

. This court has a right to take judicial notice of its own record. Hillsborough County Board of County Commissioners v. Public Employees Relation Commission, 424 So. 2d 132 (Fla. 1st DCA 1982); City of West Palm Beach v. Mann, 387 So. 2d 531 (Fla. 4th DCA 1980); § 90.202, Fla. Stat. (1991).


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Cited By

  • McHUGH v. McHUGH, 819 So. 2d 947 (Fla. 4th DCA 2002)
    …attorney’s fees on the ground that appellee litigated in bad faith. Appellant made no request for fees prior to final judgment, and the trial court did not reserve jurisdiction to award fees in the final judgment. See Conley v. Shutts & Bowen, P.A., 622 So. 2d 559, 559 (Fla. 3d DCA 1993); Cibula v. Cibula, 578 So. 2d 519, 521 (Fla. 4th DCA 1991). WARNER, SHAHOOD and HAZOURI, JJ., concur.…

Authorities Cited

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw