BILLY RAY HOLLY, APPELLANT,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE

Fla. 5th DCA | 1995-02-03
No. 94-842
Dauksch, J., Cobb, J., Thompson, J.
651 So. 2d 707 Florida District Court of Appeal, Fifth District (1995)

AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.

Synopsis

Affirmed conviction for arson despite police deception during interrogation, but vacated portion of sentence referencing 'First Step' program outside Volusia County.


Holding

A trial court's finding that a confession was voluntary and not coerced is presumed correct and will not be reversed on appeal despite police lying and extended questioning.


Headnotes

[1] A trial court's finding that a confession was voluntary and not coerced is presumed correct and will not be reversed on appeal despite police deception and extended inter…

Previewing 1 of 1 headnotes on this case. FLexlaw’s editorially structured points of law — every proposition, pinpointed — are reserved for members.

Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence

Key Quotes

“While there is no question the police lied to this appellant, kept him under questioning for some four hours, with intermittent breaks, and promised, untruthfully, to help find the murderer of his father, the decision of the trial judge, under all the circumstances of this case, is presumed correct.”

Court acknowledging police deception but applying presumption of correctness to trial judge's voluntariness finding

Facts & Procedural History

Appellant was convicted of arson after confessing to the crime during police interrogation lasting approximately four hours with intermittent breaks, …

The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.

Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence

© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.


Opinion of the Court
DAUKSCH, Judge.

DAUKSCH, Judge.

This is an appeal from a conviction and sentence in an arson case. Appellant challenges the trial court’s finding that his confession to the crime was not coerced and voluntary. While there is no question the police lied to this appellant, kept him under questioning for some four hours, with intermittent breaks, and promised, untruthfully, to help find the murderer of his father, the decision of the trial judge, under all the circumstances of this case, is presumed correct. It will not be reversed. McNamara v. State, 357 So. 2d 410 (Fla.1978).

This sentence raises the first appearance of “First Step” in a county in this district other than Volusia. That portion of the sentence is stricken. Fyler v. State, 645 So. 2d 108 (Fla. 5th DCA 1994); McLeod v. State, 645 So. 2d 116 (Fla. 5th DCA 1994); Sweet v. State, 644 So. 2d 176 (Fla. 5th DCA 1994); Mittner v. State, 648 So. 2d 139 (Fla. 5th DCA 1994); Tibero v. State, 646 So. 2d 213 (Fla. 5th DCA 1994); Murray v. State, 647 So. 2d 313 (Fla. 5th DCA 1994); Avallone v. State, 646 So. 2d 745 (Fla. 5th DCA 1994); Watson v. State, 641 So. 2d 432 (Fla. 5th DCA 1994); Macon v. State, 639 So. 2d 206 (Fla. 5th DCA 1994); Eckenrode v. State, 638 So. 2d 214 (Fla. 5th DCA 1994); Botts v. State, 634 So. 2d 197 (Fla. 5th DCA 1994).

JUDGMENT AFFIRMED; SENTENCE AFFIRMED in part; VACATED in part.

COBB and THOMPSON, JJ., concur.


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Authorities Cited (15 total)

View all 15 cited authorities →

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw