MICHAEL WONDERLICK, APPELLANT,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE

Citator

Cited By

• Speights v. State, 711 So. 2d 167 (Fla. 1st DCA 1998)
  …permit the state to introduce evidence of additional predicate offenses beyond those relied upon originally if a habitual offender sentence is overturned because it was based [*169] on non-sequential prior convictions); see also Henderson v. State, 651 So. 2d 822 (Fla. 4th DCA 1995).1 Thus, the alleged error herein does not satisfy the definition of an illegal sentence set forth in Callaway and Davis. We conclude that reliance on an improper predicate offense does not render the sentence “illegal” for purpos…
• Lloyd v. State, 844 So. 2d 713 (Fla. 2d DCA 2003)
  …e simply entitled to a new sentencing hearing where the necessary evidence is presented and the correct law is applied. See Cameron v. State, 807 So. 2d 744 (Fla. 4th DCA 2002); Brown v. State, 701 So. 2d 410 (Fla. 1st DCA 1997); Henderson v. State, 651 So. 2d 822 (Fla. 4th DCA 1995). See, e.g., Pelham v. State, 815 So. 2d 733 (Fla. 2d DCA 2002); Singleton v. State, 760 So. 2d 250 (Fla. 2d DCA 2000); Yankovski v. State, 785 So. 2d 1283 (Fla. 5th DCA 2001); see also Mann v. State, 453 So. 2d 784 (Fla.1984). T…
• Carver v. State, 653 So. 2d 510 (Fla. 4th DCA 1995)
  …g be awarded against the sentence eventually imposed. The sentences on the two cases run concurrently. In that situation, the defendant must be given credit on both sentences. Daniels v. State, 491 So. 2d 543 (Fla.1986). See also Henderson v. State, 651 So. 2d 822 (Fla. 4th DCA 1995). Any other result would have the effect of depriving appellant of the credit that he is due under the statute. GLICKSTEIN, WARNER and STEVENSON, JJ., concur.…

Authorities Cited

• Novaton v. State, 634 So. 2d 607 (Fla. 1994)
• Gainer v. State, 590 So. 2d 1001 (Fla. 1st DCA 1991)
• State v. Elishua Joshua Wright, 546 So. 2d 798 (Fla. 1st DCA 1989)
• Onesky v. State, 544 So. 2d 1048 (Fla. 2d DCA 1989)