I.M., THE NATURAL MOTHER OF C.M. AND C.M., MINOR CHILDREN, APPELLANT,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA, DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND REHABILITATIVE SERVICES, APPELLEE
PER CURIAM.
The mother appeals from an order terminating her parental rights. While it appears there would have been sufficient proof presented to support a determination that the parental rights of the mother should be terminated, we cannot conduct appropriate appellate review because the statutory factors enumerated in section 39.4612, Florida Statutes (Supp.1994), are not addressed in either the order or the transcript. We, therefore, reverse and remand for further consideration. See In the Interest of C.M.P., 608 So. 2d 568 (Fla. 1st DCA 1992), and In the Interest of R.J., et al., 586 So. 2d 496 (Fla. 1st DCA 1991).
JOANOS, WOLF and VAN NORTWICK, JJ., concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
P.J. as Parent of B.H. v. Dep't OF Child. & Families, 783 So. 2d 1148 (Fla. 5th DCA 2001)…ate as much. As a result, we must vacate the instant termination order and remand this matter to the trial court with instructions to enter a termination order which complies with the statute. See I.M. v. Dep’t of Health and Rehabilitative Services, 668 So. 2d 275 (Fla. 1st DCA 1996); In the Interest of C.K., 601 So. 2d 1331 (Fla. 2d DCA 1992). We further agree with the mother that the instant termination order improperly cites to section 39.806(l)(h) of the Florida Statutes (1999) as a legal basis to suppo…
-
T.C. v. Dep't of Health & Rehabilitative Servs., 681 So. 2d 893 (Fla. 4th DCA 1996)…and every factor listed in section 39.4612 and to, be reversible if the order fails to do so. See In re C.K., 601 So. 2d 1331 (Fla. 2d DCA 1992); In re C.M.P., 608 So. 2d 568 (Fla. 1st DCA 1992); I.M. v. Department of Health & Rehabilitative Servs., 668 So. 2d 275 (Fla. 1st DCA 1996). To Me extent that these cases require that the order recite and discuss each and every factor, we disagree with their interpretation of the relevant statutes. However, we deem this to be a case where there is overwhelming eviden…
-
T.O. v. L. S., 954 So. 2d 737 (Fla. 1st DCA 2007)…‘manifest best interests’ ”). C.C. v. Dep’t of Child. & Fam. Servs., 812 So. 2d 520, 523 (Fla. 1st DCA 2002). Ac [*738] cordingly, I agree to “reverse and remand for further consideration.” I.M. v. State, Dep’t of Health & Rehabilitative Servs., 668 So. 2d 275, 275 (Fla. 1st DCA 1996).…1 / 2
Previewing 3 of 4 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligenceAuthorities Cited
- In the Interest of R.J., 586 So. 2d 496 (Fla. 1st DCA 1991)
- In the Interest of C.M.P., 608 So. 2d 568 (Fla. 1st DCA 1992)