JAVIER ODIO, APPELLANT,
v.
THE STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
JAVIER ODIO, APPELLANT,
THE STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
692 So. 2d 293
Florida District Court of Appeal, Third District (1997)
Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.
Affirmed. See Whren v. United States, — U.S. -, 116 S.Ct. 1769, 135 L.Ed.2d 89 (1996); State v. Holland, 680 So. 2d 1041 (Fla. 1st DCA 1996), review granted, 689 So. 2d 1069 (Fla. 1997); State v. Corvin, 677 So. 2d 947 (Fla. 2d DCA 1996); Petrel v. State, 675 So. 2d 1049 (Fla. 4th DCA 1996). See generally Saturnino-Boudet v. State, 682 So. 2d 188, 191 n. 5 (Fla. 3d DCA 1996)(noting District Courts of Appeal’s observation that Whren has substantially altered search and seizure jurisprudence as it pertains to traffic stops), review dismissed, 689 So. 2d 1071 (Fla.1997).
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Authorities Cited
- Whren v. United States, 517 U.S. 806 (U.S. 1996)
- Saturnino-Boudet v. State, 682 So. 2d 188 (Fla. 3d DCA 1996)
- Petrel v. State, 675 So. 2d 1049 (Fla. 4th DCA 1996)
- State v. Corvin, 677 So. 2d 947 (Fla. 2d DCA 1996)
- State v. Gagne, 680 So. 2d 1041 (Fla. 4th DCA 1996)
- State v. Holland, 680 So. 2d 1041 (Fla. 1st DCA 1996)