HARRY K. SINGLETARY, SECRETARY, FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, APPELLANT,

v.

BENJAMIN OWENS, APPELLEE

Citator

Cited By

• Rinderer v. State, 857 So. 2d 955 (Fla. 4th DCA 2003)
  …the direct appeal and thus complied with the requirements of rule 3.850. The general rule is that when there is a discrepancy between the written sentence and the oral pronouncement, the oral pronouncement prevails. See, e.g., Broomfield v. State, 698 So. 2d 932 (Fla. 4th DCA 1997). The State argues that there was no discrepancy between the oral pronouncement of sentence and the 'written sentencing order because the trial court orally pronounced the defendant’s sentence as a habitual violent felony offender…
• Jacques Louisgeste v. State, 706 So. 2d 29 (Fla. 4th DCA 1998)
  …As the oral pronouncement of sentence controls over the written sentence, appellant’s sentence must be remanded to the trial court to correct the scrivener’s errors in order to conform with the trial court’s oral pronouncement. Broomfield v. State, 698 So. 2d 932 (Fla. 4th DCA 1997). Appellant also contests the imposition of $787 in public defender’s fee. He maintains that the trial court erred in failing to advise him of his right to a hearing to contest the amount imposed as set forth in Florida Rule of C…

Authorities Cited

• Singletary v. Jones, 681 So. 2d 836 (Fla. 1st DCA 1996)
• McINNIS v. Jerrold Ramasami, 692 So. 2d 300 (Fla. 4th DCA 1997)
• Singletary v. Wellon, 692 So. 2d 300 (Fla. 4th DCA 1997)