YVETTE MICHELLE BOULWARE, APPELLANT/CROSS-APPELLEE,
v.
COALITION FOR THE HOMELESS OF CENTRAL FLORIDA, APPELLEE/CROSS-APPELLANT
DAUKSCH, Judge.
This is an appeal from a judgment denying relief based upon a complaint for wrongful discharge from employment and related claims. We affirm the judgment but reverse the order denying costs to appellee. § 57.041, Fla. Stat. (1997); Oriental Imports, Inc. v. Alilin, 559 So. 2d 442 (Fla. 5th DCA 1990); Governing Bd. of St Johns River Water Management District v. Lake Pickett Ltd., 543 So. 2d 883 (Fla. 5th DCA 1989); Calder Race Course, Inc. v. Gaitan, 430 So. 2d 975 (Fla. 3d DCA 1983). The judgment is affirmed, the order denying costs is reversed and this cause remanded for entry of a judgment for costs for appellee.
Judgment AFFIRMED; costs order REVERSED; REMANDED.
GRIFFIN, C.J., and ANTOON, J., concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Seiberlich v. Wolf, 859 So. 2d 570 (Fla. 5th DCA 2003)…proceedings. Furthermore, the reduction in support due to substantial time sharing is mandatory. Migliore v. Harris, 848 So. 2d 1250 (Fla. 4th DCA 2003); Santiago v. Santiago, 830 So. 2d 922 (Fla. 4th DCA 2002). This case is unlike Knight v. Knight, 702 So. 2d 242 (Fla. 4th DCA 1997), and its progeny, which preclude downward modification of support when the only basis for finding a change of circumstances is that the guideline formula results in lower payments. Here, the court found an independent basis for i…
-
Kim Ervin & the State of Fla. v. Chason, 750 So. 2d 148 (Fla. 1st DCA 2000)…napplicable to a situation, such as that at bar, in which a parent agrees to pay an amount above the guidelines and later files for modification to obtain a reduction, without showing any decrease in income or in the child’s needs. Knight v. Knight, 702 So. 2d 242 (Fla. 4th DCA 1997); Turner v. Turner, 695 So. 2d 422 (Fla. 3d DCA 1997). [*150] In the case at bar, although the trial court did not incorporate a marital settlement agreement into the final order, the father admitted that the parties had agreed to…
-
Ellisen v. Ellisen, 150 So. 3d 1270 (Fla. 5th DCA 2014)…fication of an existing order of support is sought, the proof required to modify a settlement agreement and the proof required to modify an award established by court order shall be the same.” § 61.14(7), Fla. Stat. (2012); but see Knight v. Knight, 702 So. 2d 242, 243 (Fla. 4th DCA 1997) (reasoning that the rule in Overbey still applies because the Florida Supreme Court in that case must have been aware of the prior statutory change).…
Previewing 3 of 8 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligenceAuthorities Cited
- Oriental Imports, Inc. v. Rosario Alilin and E. Roger Alilin, M.D., 559 So. 2d 442 (Fla. 5th DCA 1990)
- Governing Bd. of the ST. Johns River Water Mgmt. Dist. v. Lake Pickett Ltd., 543 So. 2d 883 (Fla. 5th DCA 1989)
- Calder Race Course, Inc. v. Gaitan, 430 So. 2d 975 (Fla. 3d DCA 1983)
- Marin-Verance v. State, 430 So. 2d 975 (Fla. 3d DCA 1983)