CARMEN GARCIA SILVEUS, PETITIONER,

v.

MICHAEL J. SILVEUS, RESPONDENT

Citator

Cited By

• Cruz-Govin v. Torres, 29 So. 3d 393 (Fla. 3d DCA 2010)
  …ot have addressed this issue in his case. See C.L. v. Judd, 993 So. 2d 991, 995-96 (Fla. 2d DCA 2007); Leonard v. Leonard, 673 So. 2d 97, 99 (Fla. 1st DCA 1996); Peisach v. Antuna, 539 So. 2d 544, 546 (Fla. 3d DCA 1989); see also Silveus v. Silveus, 807 So. 2d 790 (Fla. 2d DCA 2002) (quashing order directing release of psychological records holding that petitioner did not place her mental health at issue by presenting evidence to counter allegations that she was mentally unstable); Arias v. Urban, 595 So. 2d…
• Monroe v. State, 978 So. 2d 177 (Fla. 2d DCA 2007)
  …dismissal by requiring a specific demand and a “recapture” period within which to try a prisoner. The State cites the Florida Supreme Court’s decision in Vining v. State, 637 So. 2d 921 (Fla.1994), to support this argument. See also State v. Garza, 807 So. 2d 790 (Fla. 2d DCA 2002). Although we recognize that Vining acts to provide the State a recapture period under the IADA, it does not assist the State in this case. Here, the State did not request or avail itself of the recapture period to immediately brin…

  ← 1 / 2 →
• GEE v. State, 954 So. 2d 83 (Fla. 1st DCA 2007)
  …cCullers, 932 So. 2d 373 (Fla. 2d DCA 2006). Petitioner argues that he filed his motion to dismiss in reliance on the IAD and therefore rule 3.191 does not apply. However, cases such as Vining v. State, 637 So. 2d 921 (Fla.1994) and State v. Garza, 807 So. 2d 790 (Fla. 2d DCA 2002) indicate otherwise. In light of those cases, we find that rule 3.191, or at least subdivision (p) thereof, applies to a party seeking to invoke his or her speedy trial rights under the IAD in this state. The correctness of this co…

Authorities Cited

• Palm Beach Cnty. Sch. Bd. & Terry Andrews v. Morrison, 621 So. 2d 464 (Fla. 4th DCA 1993)
• Leonard v. Leonard, 673 So. 2d 97 (Fla. 1st DCA 1996)
• Peisach v. Antuna, 539 So. 2d 544 (Fla. 3d DCA 1989)