VICTOR RIVERA, PETITIONER,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA, RESPONDENT

Fla. | 2009-02-26
No. SC07-936
QUINCE, C.J., and WELLS, PARIENTE, LEWIS, CANADY, POLSTON, and LABARGA, JJ., concur.
3 So. 3d 1193 Florida Supreme Court (2009) Caution
Cited by 1 case


Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.

PER CURIAM.

We initially accepted jurisdiction to review the decision of the Third District Court of Appeal in Rivera v. State, 954 So.2d 1216 (Fla. 3d DCA 2007), review granted, 968 So.2d 557 (Fla.2007) (table), based on express and direct conflict with the decisions of the other district courts in Hinkel v. State, 937 So.2d 1201 (Fla. 5th DCA 2006), Briggs v. State, 929 So.2d 1151 (Fla. 5th DCA 2006), Reed v. State, 810 So.2d 1025 (Fla. 2d DCA 2002), Henderson v. State, 720 So.2d 1121 (Fla. 4th DCA 1998), Tillman v. State, 693 So.2d 626 (Fla. 2d DCA 1997), Silverstein v. State, 654 So.2d 1040 (Fla. 4th DCA 1995), and Van Ellis v. State, 455 So.2d 1065 (Fla. 1st DCA 1984). See art. V, § 3(b)(4), Fla. Const. After further, full consideration, we have determined that we should exercise our discretion and discharge jurisdiction. Accordingly, this review proceeding is dismissed.

It is so ordered.

QUINCE, C.J., and WELLS, PARIENTE, LEWIS, CANADY, POLSTON, and LABARGA, JJ., concur.


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Cited By

  • Murray Breitberg v. State, 14 So. 3d 1253 (Fla. 4th DCA 2009)
    …only when it is apparent from the face of the record that the criteria for designation were not met. It then quashed our decision in this case, and remanded for reconsideration and review of the record based upon Saintelien. See Breitberg v. State, 3 So. 3d 1193 (Fla.2009). Because the issue raised on this challenge is not within the narrow ruling of Saintelien, we affirm. Appellant claims his sexual predator designation is void, because it was entered after he had filed a notice of appeal from his qualify…

Authorities Cited

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw