LAZARO FLORES, PETITIONER,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA, RESPONDENT
LAZARO FLORES, PETITIONER,
STATE OF FLORIDA, RESPONDENT
93 So. 3d 324
Florida Supreme Court (2012)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 2 cases
Opinion of the Court
We initially accepted jurisdiction to review the decision of the Third District Court of Appeal in Flores v. State, 46 So.3d 102 (Fla. 3d DCA 2010), based on express and direct conflict. See art. V, § 3(b)(3), Fla. Const. Upon further consideration, we have determined that jurisdiction was improvidently granted. Accordingly, we hereby discharge jurisdiction and dismiss this review proceeding.
It is so ordered.
CANADY, C.J., and PARIENTE, QUINCE, POLSTON, LABARGA, and PERRY, JJ., concur.
LEWIS, J., dissents.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Ocelyn ST. CYR v. State, 106 So. 3d 487 (Fla. 4th DCA 2013)…So. 2d 898, 899 (Fla. 3d DCA 2005)). The confusion was clarified by the Fifth District Court of Appeal in Christian v. State, 84 So. 3d 437, 440 (Fla. 5th DCA 2012). See also Flores v. State, 46 So. 3d 102, 104-05 (Fla. 3d DCA 2010), rev. dismissed, 93 So. 3d 324 (Fla.2012). A defendant need not have been charged or convicted of the new offense constituting the substantive violation in order for a court to sentence a youthful offender in excess of the six-year cap. See Lee v. State, 67 So. 3d 1199, 1202 (Fl…
Authorities Cited
- Flores v. State, 46 So. 3d 102 (Fla. 3d DCA 2010)
- Azar Osmanovic v. State, 46 So. 3d 102 (Fla. 1st DCA 2010)