CODY HUGGINS, APPELLANT,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
CODY HUGGINS, APPELLANT,
STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
216 So. 3d 785
Florida District Court of Appeal, Second District (2017)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 4 cases
Opinion of the Court
In this Anders1 appeal, we affirm Cody Huggins’ judgments and sentences and the revocation of his probation. However, the order of revocation of probation entered on December 4, 2016, does not identify the conditions found to have been violated. We remand solely for entry of a corrected revocation order specifying the condition(s) of probation that Mr. Huggins violated. See Greene v. State, 919 So.2d 684, 686 (Fla. 2d DCA 2006) (“A proper order of revocation will identify the specific conditions of probation violated by the defendant.”).
Affirmed; remanded with directions.
NORTHCUTT, CASANUEVA, and MORRIS, JJ., Concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Rodriguez v. State, 232 So. 3d 483 (Fla. 2d DCA 2017)…judgment and sentence that were entered without further comment, but because the order of revocation does not specify the conditions Rodriguez admitted violating, we remand for the entry of an order specifying those conditions. See Huggins v. State, 216 So. 3d 785 (Fla. 2d DCA 2017). Affirmed; remanded with directions. NORTHCUTT, BLACK, and SALARIO, JJ., Concur.…
-
Rekala Morrison v. State, 230 So. 3d 623 (Fla. 2d DCA 2017)…21, 2017, nunc pro tunc to February 16, 2017, does not identify the conditions found to be violated. We remand solely for entry of a corrected revocation order specifying the conditions of probation that Ms. Morrison violated. See Huggins v. State, 216 So. 3d 785, 785 (Fla. 2d DCA 2017); Greene v. State, 919 So. 2d 684, 685 (Fla. 2d DCA 2006) (“A proper order of revocation will identify the specific conditions of probation violated by the defendant.” (citing Greer v. State, 831 So. 2d 1261, 1262 (Fla. 2d DCA…
-
Clifton v. State, 241 So. 3d 274 (Fla. 2d DCA 2018)…admitted violating—specifically conditions (3) - 2 - and (10) as set forth in the affidavit of violation—we remand for the entry of an order specifying those conditions. See Rodriguez v. State, 232 So. 3d 483 (Fla. 2d DCA 2017); Huggins v. State, 216 So. 3d 785 (Fla. 2d DCA 2017). Affirmed; remanded with directions. KHOUZAM, LUCAS, and SALARIO, JJ., Concur.…
Previewing 3 of 4 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligenceAuthorities Cited
- Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (U.S. 1967)
- Greene v. State, 919 So. 2d 684 (Fla. 2d DCA 2006)