JAMES DEAN CLIFTON, JR.
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA
AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.
Probation revocation is affirmed, but the revocation order must be remanded to specify the particular probation conditions violated.
[1] A probation revocation order must specify the particular conditions of probation that the probationer violated.
Previewing 1 of 1 headnotes on this case. FLexlaw’s editorially structured points of law — every proposition, pinpointed — are reserved for members.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligenceClifton was adjudicated guilty in 2013 of two counts of sale of hydrocodone and placed on probation. He subsequently violated conditions (3) and (10) …
The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.
Explore caselaw by topic → Browse Negligent Operation Of A Motor Vehicle cases and more on FLexlaw
PER CURIAM.
In this appeal proceeding under Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), we affirm, without comment, the revocation of the probation Mr. Clifton was serving following his 2013 adjudication for two counts of sale of hydrocodone and the resulting sentences imposed after that revocation. However, because the order of revocation does not specify the conditions Mr. Clifton admitted violating—specifically conditions (3) and (10) as set forth in the affidavit of violation—we remand for the entry of an order specifying those conditions. See Rodriguez v. State, 232 So. 3d 483 (Fla. 2d DCA 2017); Huggins v. State, 216 So. 3d 785 (Fla. 2d DCA 2017). Affirmed; remanded with directions.
KHOUZAM, LUCAS, and SALARIO, JJ., Concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Authorities Cited
- Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (U.S. 1967)
- Huggins v. State, 216 So. 3d 785 (Fla. 2d DCA 2017)
- State v. Murillo, 216 So. 3d 785 (Fla. 1st DCA 2017)
- Rodriguez v. State, 232 So. 3d 483 (Fla. 2d DCA 2017)
- Williams v. Marye Johnson, 232 So. 3d 483 (Fla. 3d DCA 2017)